Xls

Hello!

I see you are listed in Category:Wikipedians in Germany. I have made subcategories for each Bundesland in case you would like to add yourself to the appropriate one. See Category:Wikipedians in Germany for a list of the subcategories (they use the English names, the same as their Wikipedia articles). --Angr (tɔk) 16:25, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Simpsons

Hi, is there a reason why you're creating templates that serve no purpose? --JD ^{don't talk} _{email me} 10:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

See:

• Template:Simpsons season 1 sepcolor
• Template:Simpsons season 1 color1
• Template:Simpsons season 17 sepcolor
• Template:Simpsons season 17 color1

--Xls 10:44, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

What purpose do they serve? What do they do? --JD ^{don't talk} _{email me} 10:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Please ask User:Kaizersoze! --Xls 10:49, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Reply

I didn't change it. I was reverting a bunch of garbage edits made to season 18 and they took place almost a dozen eidts back. So, I reverted back to the last time I made an edit a week ago which I guess readded brown to season 10. -- Scorpion 17:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! --Xls 17:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Season lists

Instead of removing content from The Simpsons season 8, you should try and make the other pages like that one. It is a featured list. --Maitch 20:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Why do we need a list of writers/directors in this episode list? All other (from 1 - 7 and 9 - 19) Simpsons episode lists don't mention it. --Xls 20:42, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Because they are rubbish, they are not as good as Season 8. Hence why they are not FLs. FL episode lists need writers and directors. So please don't remove them, thankyou! Gran² 20:43, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Y --Xls 20:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:EABF12.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:EABF12.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 15:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Seconds From Disaster

Thanks for making your edits to the episode lists. The fact that the questions were there is why I tagged it as being written in a promotional tone, I just didn't have enough time to do it myself. Now that that's out of the way, the episode descriptions may need a bit more detail, but thanks anyway. ætərnal ðrAعon → 08:52, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Simpsons

It may help if you give out warnings, since there seems to be an IP kick of putting false information on List of The Simpsons chalkboard gags‎ In case you don't know where the warnings are...they are here Ctjf83 18:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

If you see this user vandalize again, report him. he is on the final warning i'll look at the user's contributions when i wake up Ctjf83 08:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Quick update...s/he has been blocked for 31 hrs Ctjf83 08:22, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

what r u talking about?! he is putting random info on the couch gag page Ctjf83 08:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC) ::I'm sorry, i'm drunk, but i'm confused, u said he is "hardly vandalizing" but you can't find the "Vandalism Report page", so i'm confused as to what you are saying, you think he is, or is not vandalizing?!? Ctjf83 09:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

He is vandalizing --Xls 15:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

ok, he is blocked for 31 hrs, but i'm trying to get all 3 accounts blocked longer Ctjf83 18:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Small tip: Next time you see him vandalize a page, immediately warn him on his talk page using a Vandalism template, then he can be blocked quicker. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 14:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

are you remembering to warn?? here are the correct templates Ctjf83 ^talk 07:50, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

I could when he doesn't have a last warning by another user (7:40). --Xls (talk) 07:56, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

OK, i was just making sure you had the right templates this time Ctjf83 ^talk 07:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Babf08.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Babf08.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CABF20.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CABF20.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of The Simpsons couch gags

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of The Simpsons couch gags. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of The Simpsons couch gags. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Homer is old Bart is an adult.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Homer is old Bart is an adult.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 09:06, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Maudedeath.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maudedeath.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:36, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)