Xloem
Disproof edit
1. The argument was not precisely so you did not figure out the counterargument. Said number is vague in on bit in the hypothetical attempted count, therefore not allowed, therefore ejected, causing the number derived from the new diagonal to not be vague in one bit, thus is in the set being counted (though not really, it's too wide). You are supposed to solve this problem, not language. We consider it unsolvable. GOD claims he can do the count, but the diagonal is randomized so not algorithmic, and HE can't put the diagonal derived number(s) in intentionally only attempt to since it's mathematically impossible. In this case only he considers their argument false due to self reference.
The natural numbers greater argument is too vague to understand. In the future you must make your argument very clear, in standard mathematical form as near as practicable, and Absolutely without error. Victor Kosko (talk) 23:58, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Logistics edit
Xloem (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I request an exemption from IP address blocks. I use tor to work around various network connectivity issues, which are more common for me because I am without a personal fixed dwelling and experience cognitive decline. My name is Karl Semich, and I presently live in Vermont, USA.
Decline reason:
Procedural decline as we don't grant IPBE through this process. Go to UTRS and follow the instructions there. — Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.