Xenosludge

Xenosludge, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Xenosludge! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Xenosludge! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Restor has a new comment

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Restor. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Restor (February 26)

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Source analysis in terms of notability:

- VOX is a reliable secondary source, and provides significant coverage of the subject = accepted.

- The Guardian is a reliable secondary source, and although the article is not primarily focused on the subject of this draft, provides nevertheless good coverage = accepted with some reservations.

- The BBC is a reliable secondary source, but the two articles cited only provide passing mentions = not accepted in terms of notability, although can be used to support individual statements.

- Forbes may or may not be reliable secondary source; in this case it isn't, as the piece is written by a team of contributors, incl. one closely associated with the subject, and in any case mentions it only in passing = not accepted.

- The others are all primary, and therefore do not contribute towards notability.

Conclusion: notability not yet established, needs IMO at least one other solid reference meeting the WP:GNG standard, in line with WP:ORGCRIT.

--

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Restor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Restor, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Restor

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Xenosludge. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Restor, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic