Hi, you cannot change the source (reference) as you did with Agios Thomas Diaporion - sources are used to back up statements in the article, and your new source did not contain the original statements (45 minutes and from Corinth in 20 minutes.). If you wish, you can add or change the content, and use a new source to back up your text. WikiHannibal (talk) 21:12, 6 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Environics Research logo.png edit

Thanks for uploading File:Environics Research logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:INKAS Logo.png edit

Thanks for uploading File:INKAS Logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HTTPA edit

Please chime in at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HTTPA. —Ruud 12:15, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Xaxing, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 13:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

-->

Reviewing edit

Hi, please be careful when reviewing new articles. I see you marked NEM KOSAL as reviewed, even though the version at the time [1] was an exact copy of Chan Vathanaka. A giveaway clue for this was that the article name and the bolded first sentence did not match. Just a note to be more thorough, and thanks for the work! CrowCaw 16:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for the heads up. I missed that one. Thank you for bothering to notify me. I will be vigilant next time. Irakakiku (talk) 17:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Football Kit templates edit

Hi Xaxing,

In the name of learning I would be happy to add a football kit box to the Ourimbah Wyoming Magpies to which I have begun contributing. However, it would help greatly if I know what patterns are available for the torso, and how to use stipes on the sox. For Ourimbah I need a double V (white on black) and black and white striped sox.

Nhoj1898 (talk) 15:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Salute, a good place to look would be to find another article with almost similar colors and copy some code from there. Also check out WikiProject_Football for help on how to do this. Personally I do not know how to make them. Good luckIrakakiku (talk) 17:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Deletion of {{Persondata}} edit

Hi Xaxing,

I'm the bot who is deleting {{Persondata}}. I noticed your edit on Melissa VanFleet in which you added {{Persondata}}. This template is deprecated and deleted. Please stop adding {{Persondata}}. In case you want to support the Persondata project you can help with the migration of the dataset to Wikidata at KasparBot's tool. See Wikipedia:Persondata or contact my operator T.seppelt (talk · contribs) in case you have questions.

Thank you very much, -- KasparBot (talk) 16:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Xaxing. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year, Xaxing edit

 

November 2017 edit

Please after your Seven month uninterrupted Wiki break it is important to review the relevant Speedy and proposed deletions policies and guidelines, it may help to avoid inappropriate deletion taggings you just started on some pages.  — Ammarpad (talk) 12:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Xaxing. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2018 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Primefac (talk) 14:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Xaxing (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not in any way affiliated to the person I am accused of sockpuppetting. The blocking admin also stated after I reached out to them via email that they couldn't give evidence for blocking. In fact they stated it was a discussion conducted somewhere and I have tried to search for it but couldn't find it anywhere on Wikipedia. Xaxing (talk) 14:39, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

  Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 12:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • For reference, I was the one contacted, and the discussion was between the functionaries. Pinging KrakatoaKatie, who ran the CU. Primefac (talk) 16:38, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply
    • I'm confident in my interpretation of the CU result. Katietalk 23:57, 12 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Abacus data.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Abacus data.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Abacus data.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Abacus data.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:53, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply