Wikipedia

User talk:Xaosflux/Archive29

< User talk:Xaosflux
Latest comment: 14 years ago by EdwardsBot in topic The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:01, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 17:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 05:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 11 May 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 18 May 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:49, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 25 May 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 1 June 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 23:16, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 15 June 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 22 June 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 July 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 July 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 15:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 3 August 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:59, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 10 August 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:24, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Mousse
Inverse relationship
Direct relationship
Coalescence (meteorology)
Pollock (film)
Sugar Rush
8 Heads in a Duffel Bag
Coenobitidae
League of Gentlemen (band)
Funding
Richmond Renegades
Berlinetta
Séura
Spanish Main
Iusacell
Seura
Weaning
Case preservation
Warwick School District
Cleanup
Sam Fisher
Behind Blue Eyes
Apprenticeship
Merge
Supernumerary nipple
Silent Hill (film)
Bank holding company
Add Sources
Tobin Bell
Leigh Whannell
History of swimming
Wikify
Breaststroke
Cult following
Kid Rock
Expand
C corporation
Interest rate
Fantomex

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:10, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 17 August 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 05:04, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion


The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

CfD nomination of Category:Hindu worship

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have nominated Category:Hindu worship (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Hindu liturgy, rites, and worship services (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020 (talk) 16:54, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Just wondering..

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

How come Wikistalking is protected against creation? I see that it was used as a cross-namespace redirect a few times, but it seems like it could be a useful article about stalking on wiki-based sites if written properly. OlEnglish (talk) 23:50, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of LocalSettings.php

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article LocalSettings.php, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

LocalSettings seems to be only used by MediaWiki (see also google search).

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Wuzur (talk) 12:15, 22 February 2009 (UTC)


Ikip

Latest comment: 15 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

What's up with that block? We don't do blocks for self-requests. Toddst1 (talk) 00:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

If someone comes to me and nicely ask if they they can be blocked, I've got no issue with it. Some users may find it hard to go relax when they can edit. What's the harm here? — xaosflux Talk 01:21, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Admins should use thier own judgement on requests like this. If honoring it doesn't hurt anyone and helps out a long time editor, then why not. I know at one time or another there was some rule somewhere that we shouldn't give self-requested blocks, but rules at wikipedia change alot. Using ones own judgement and rationale at times like this is fine. There was nothing wrong with your block, Xaosflux--Duk 22:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, as there are no other notes, and A Man In Black has not replied to why he reversed me, I'm reinstating. If this user really needs this to cool off, let him. If he is 'disruptive' after retuning, normal blocks can be applied. — xaosflux Talk 00:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
A related discussion: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Remember_WP:BLOCKME.3F Toddst1 (talk) 02:49, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the note. — xaosflux Talk 03:38, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Filter 46

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

It is slower because it searches "old_wikitext", the entire text of the page. Prodego talk 03:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

That's what I was commenting on--perhaps too much there---note, the "edit" I made was to the COMMENT only--there must have been some sort of edit conflict that caused my version to change the condition. — xaosflux Talk 03:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
My change reduced its average runtime to 2.4ms, see Special:AbuseFilter/46. Let me know if this is sufficent. —— nixeagleemail me 04:01, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Its up to 5.5ms, still better then 12ms. There are other filters worse now ;) Ping me if you find any that need fixing. —— nixeagleemail me 04:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


Hello!

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I just thought I'd introduce myself, as a fellow member of the BAG at the very least. I must say that though I have not been around very long, I was slightly thrown to see your name on a BRFA. "Who is this guy?" I thought to myself - and hence how I ended up here, wasting the time of a Wikipedian much more experienced than me. Anyhow, pleased to meet you! - Jarry1250 (t, c) 14:39, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

(replied on your talk) — xaosflux Talk 03:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

email confirmation code

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I didn't realize there was an email confirmation for Wikipedia. I waited too long to use the confirmation code. Can i get another confirmation code in my email? Ti-30X (talk) 02:20, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

(replied on your talk). — xaosflux Talk 03:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


Your deletion of my editnotice loader

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

You deleted my talkpage editnotice loader: log

Then you edited my talkpage editnotice so your change wouldn't be so visible: diff

And unlucky for me you did it when I was on a wikibreak, thus I did not see it in my watchlist. You just wasted a lot of my time since it took me some debugging to figure out why my editnotices didn't work as they should any longer.

I'm an admin and I'm one of the template programmers that have tried to give the rest of you a user-friendly well working editnotice system. Many of the templates used to manage editnotices were created and are still maintained by me.

Next time you think about deleting or editing a user's editnotices or other user subpages, don't. And if you do it anyway, the least you can do is to leave a message at their talk page telling what you have done. They might not be there the same week to see it in their watchlists.

--David Göthberg (talk) 18:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

enot response

David, Apologies for any inconvenience I caused you, yes I should have at least left you a talk page notice; I was never trying to hide anything, was just cleaning up what appeared to be test pages in the Mediawiki: space. Now that you've brought it up though, if these pages exist soley for your own benefit, can you find a way to make them work using the User/Editnotice convention? If all users used personal editnotices in the Mediawiki: namesapce, it could get rather unmanageable. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 12:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Ehm no? That loader is not there "solely for my own benefit". I run that "personal" editnotice loader so I can test and develop loader functionality that will benefit all of you. I prefer to test things in my user space before I deploy them site wide.
And no worries: When we have updated the central loaders then almost all editnotices will be loaded from template and user space. Then only the central loaders and some test loaders like mine will remain in MediaWiki space. Thus minimizing the strain on the "message cache" in the rendering servers.
--David Göthberg (talk) 13:02, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

New image project

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. This little form letter is just a courtesy notice to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images, Wikipedia:WikiProject Fair use, Wikipedia:WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Conversation about redirecting those projects is located here. Please participate in that discussion if you have any interest, and if you still have interest in achieving the goals of the original project, we'd love to have you join in. If you aren't interested in either the conversation or the project, please pardon the interruption. :) Thanks. Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:24, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Template:F/

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Did you mean to protect Template:F/ indefinitely? Your comment on the edit says "main mage template". Was this just protecting the template because it was temporarily used on the main page? The template is still protected two years later.--Srleffler (talk) 03:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

FYI

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Xaosflux/Sandbox2/Prod. Garion96 (talk) 21:37, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedily closed, but you may wish to blank, etc. if only to remove from that maintenance category. –xeno talk 21:43, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the notes, I've blanked for now as well. — xaosflux Talk 01:46, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

User:Xaosflux/Sandbox2/Prod

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

May I ask what this sandbox is for? All it contains is a broken, obsolete prod template. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Many otters • One hammer • HELP) 22:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

I've already blanked that page..I really don't see what the current worry over this page is, I have a lot of sandboxes. If it is really, really, really, bothering you that this blank page exists, please reply, and I'll delete it. Of course it won't "save space" or anything... — xaosflux Talk 12:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


Re: Uh what?

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hmm.. what do you want me to reply with? The person's still running a proxy on 217 (on port 80), but has apparently closed it. Thanks for the unblock. =) (rpl on mine) --slakr\ talk / 19:12, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

It means that someone was running a proxy on 217.125.18.169, port 8080, and when the bot connected to my server through that proxy, the public IP that connected to my server to service that request was 80.58.205.54; as a result, while the open proxy is on 217.125.18.169, the ip that would be visible to wikipedia's servers is 80.58.205.54, thus 80 was blocked instead of 217. --slakr\ talk / 04:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

GA Sweeps invitation

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are listed as a GA reviewer. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:40, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Jonathan Shapiro

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Back in December 2007 you deleted Jonathan Shapiro for CSD#A7 Notability. However, I believe he is notable based upon the four articles that wikilink to him alone Special:WhatLinksHere/Jonathan Shapiro (I'm refering to the computer expert -- there is probably another article to be written for the writer too). Could you consider restoring it.

If the article is too bad to just be allowed to gain details just by being left as a stub (if it was one) you can usify it to me. Mark Hurd (talk) 08:15, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Now User:Wizzy has moved a third Jonathan Shapiro (Zapiro) over it. I assume it is now lost. Mark Hurd (talk) 10:40, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
In case it is not, I have moved disambiguated all the references to the computer expert to Jonathan Shapiro (programmer) Mark Hurd (talk) 10:54, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


Notification of the upcoming Wikimedia relicensing

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In case you are not aware, the Free Software Foundation has added terms to the GFDL 1.3 allowing the relicensing of certain content under the CC-BY-SA 3.0, and the community has approved with 75.8% in favor that this permission be used to dual-license all Wikimedia wikis under both licenses. On June 15, 2009, this change will take effect. This note is to let you know that {{WikimediaNoLicensing}} does not affect the relicensing of your contributions in this manner, as you cannot deny the terms of the GFDL. If you have any comments, please join the discusion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#NoMultiLicense template. Anomie⚔ 16:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


hey it's sky

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

yo. i got the net hooked up yesterday... hit me up!!!

I'm also on myspace as starita's mom

ttyl —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.85.111.231 (talk) 00:00, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Bryan Mark Rigg

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Why is he not notable:
a. The author of two best sellers translated to many languages.
b. Google result for exact search gives over 10,000 entries. First 100 all relevant and different, including podcasts, speeches, TV interviews, and scientific articles and blogs relating to this man.
b. Name used by both sides of one of the major controversies of our time: New Antisemitism, and Revisionism. (I found the name while looking something up on David Irving's site!) and strongly connected to the holocaust.
c. His personal story of research is truly remarkable.
d. His personal history is extremely unusual. A catholic from a southern state of the US happens to be on a trip to Germany, sees a theater show that gets him interested on a topic, meets a stranger who opens the topic and turns it into a lifetime research goal, and finally to discover that he personally is a Jew, who then goes to Israel and volunteers for its army!
e. His name is first under wikipedia Rigg surname but instead of pointing to Wikipedia it points out to www.bryanrigg.com
So would you consider putting the article back up? Or was it badly written? Should I write it anew and propose it? Will be happy to hear your opinion. -- פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 13:18, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Oh - and he his is the writer of a disputed recent biography on the leader of the a large Jewish sect: Chabad. So his name is sure to stay high on the list political, historic and religious dispute. --פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 13:23, 28 June 2009 (UTC)


CfD needs bot help

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please respond to this post on the CfD talk page. At present Cydebot is not processing requests that contain special characters. The questions for you are does your bot do this? Is it still running for CfD? Can you deal with the small backlog of these requests? Vegaswikian (talk) 20:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)


Belated RfA thankspam

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You participated in my atrocious RfA. I never said thank you, so I wanted to do so. {{SUBST:User:Bushcarrot/signature}} 02:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by CisRULEZ (talk • contribs) 23:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC)


Category:Pastafarian Wikipedians

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Xaosflux … FYI, I have updated the documentation for Category:Pastafarian Wikipedians because I have modified one of the userboxes to automagically populate it … the category currently contains over 250 user pages, but that should increase to over 500 pages in the next few days as the cache updates. :-)

Happy Editing! — 141.156.161.245 (talk · contribs) 05:21, 24 October 2009 (UTC)


UBX for discussion

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  An article that you have been involved in editing, User:UBX, has been proposed for a discussion. If you are interested, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. – imis☂ 00:39, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Your invited!

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wikipedia:Meetup/Miami 3 is coming up in the near future, you are invited to participate. Thanks Secret account 17:46, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

6.5 mm Grendel OR issues

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Sorry to bother you but if you have the time or know another admin in WikiProject:Firearms who would be interested I am running out of words trying to educate the co-inventor of this cartridge of the need to practice wikiverifiable editing. I don't want to start an edit war because the edits he is doing make a lot of sense. But they are OR which means any eighth grader with a computer can challenge and remove them! Trilobitealive (talk) 01:08, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Service awards proposal

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  Hello, Xaosflux/Archive29! I noticed you display a service award, and would like to invite you to join the discussion over a proposed revamping of the awards.

If you have any opinions on the proposal, please participate in the discussion. Thanks! — the Man in Question (in question) 18:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


Ping

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have sent you an e-mail. --Tenmei (talk) 18:59, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

RTV Studio B

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

On 28 May 2008 you deleted RTV Studio B because the article did not indicate the significance and importance of the subject. I have collected a number of sources which seem to me to indicate that this radio and television broadcaster does have sufficient significance and importance to justify it having an article in Wikipedia. I was therefore intending to write such an article, but, after reading "If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.", I was unsure. So, I thought it best to contact you before proceeding, and I would be grateful for a response to guide me in deciding whether to write such an article or not. Coyets (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

reply on your talk. — xaosflux Talk 12:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Aradia or the gospel of the witches

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I think the article on Wicca would be a lot better if it at least mentioned Leland, and his compilation Aradia. Although its in dispute among some follows of this faith, it contains the Charge of the Goddess, which in most circles is an important document. PLease review this, and I mention this at the end of the article so at least its there. Many people will come away not know Pre-Gardener Wicca. Just a thought! And I HOPE a a Wiccan was involved in writing this!

Blessed Be!

peacefulghost@rocketmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.131.193.112 (talk) 00:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)


Fluxbot

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I noticed Fluxbot hasn't edited since October, could I turn off the IPBE flag until you decide to re-run it to keep the list of people with the flag down? MBisanz talk 05:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Your menu.

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. I've re-used your menu on my user page.
I hope you don't my doing so - I've, of course, given credit to you.
If you do mind, tell me, and I'll remove it right away (I really should have asked BEFORE i did so)
Cheers!
HuGo_87 (talk) 10:07, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Why I dislike Wikipedia and edits like you did

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

You said the movie Beastmaster 2 stank and deleted the page. That may be true but it is sad people like you that make this thing less useful than it is. It may stink but I wanted to see what it was about. Katherine mosasaurgirl@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.151.5.126 (talk) 22:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I am unable to find the specific page you are referring to. I never delete a page because 'it stinks'. If you can refer me to the page you are talking about I can get your more information. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 01:09, 26 August 2009 (UTC)


Itterind: You also deleted the capital Stoneheim of Pomarj in the oldest D&D setting Greyhawk because of a new MMO. What pedantic foolishness.

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Upcoming changes to the English Wikipedia

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm writing on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation to let you know of some upcoming changes to Wikipedia. On May 13, we will be changing the the default skin on the English Wikipedia to Vector instead of Monobook. This change may affect some gadgets and extensions, so I wanted to let you know as you appear to be the author of/involved with one of the most widely used gadgets on the English Wikipedia. For further details, please check out the post on Village Pump.

Thanks!

Howief (talk) 21:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Wikipedia's tagline

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. I noticed that you participated in a 2005/2006 discussion and straw poll on whether or not the tagline at the top of all Wikipedia articles should be changed from "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" to "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit". I don't know if you're still interested in this issue or not, but this exact change has been proposed once again, this time at the Village pump, and there is currently an RFC (Request for Comment) on the subject where it is being discussed. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 18:12, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
International Day of Older Persons
Gwen Arner
Hotel Moskva (Moscow)
Sarah Pia Anderson
Sarah Gadon
Parks and gardens in Tokyo
Ziemassvētki
Bob West
Martha Mitchell (director)
Phil Harnage
Joydrop
Friedrich Christoph Pelizaeus
Brumalia
Porto Dinheiro
Office Administration
Tara Slone
Trudgen
Unmanned surface vehicle
Jetix (Canada)
Cleanup
List of fictional pirates
Zachariah Selwyn
Milü
Merge
Wren Day
Techniques for differentiation
Names of large numbers
Add Sources
Sidestroke
Recrudescence
Jordan Knight
Wikify
Kandi Kid
Makar Sankranti
Spanish manual alphabet
Expand
Disguise
Swimming at the 2003 World Aquatics Championships – Men's 200 metre butterfly
Peter Boyle (footballer born 1876)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:28, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Saw (soundtrack)
Love Don't Let Me Go (Walking Away)
International Day of Older Persons
Holiday tree
Trudgen
Franky G
Myriam (Myriam Faris album)
Hot Stuff (Let's Dance)
Patrick Melton
Gregg Hoffman
Sing for the Moment
HMS Kent (1798)
Habibi Dah (Nari Narain)
Sin Sin Sin
One Love (Blue song)
Evolution Entertainment
Twisted Pictures
Right Where You Want Me
Sidestroke
Cleanup
Makar Sankranti
Chipmunk discography
Someday (Nickelback song)
Merge
List of acquired or bankrupt United States banks in the late 2000s financial crisis
Names of large numbers
What a Feeling (Flashdance)
Add Sources
SAW – The Ride
Jill Tuck
Saw V
Wikify
Bettor
Kandi Kid
Breaststroke
Expand
In Real Life
Free (Erika song)
Endscape

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:41, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Xaosflux/Archive29&oldid=1166515632"