Wyatt 151

Article Edit

Just letting anyone who comes across this know that on the WWE Championship article page the picture needs to be changed to show both the WWE Title and World Heavyweight Title. Discussions can be seen on the talk page. If you can do this it would be appreciated as I can't as my ban doesn't end until tomorrow.  Done

Response to proposed deletion

Hey Wyatt - welcome to Wikipedia. I responded to your proposed deletion of Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting conspiracy theories over on the article's talk page. If you need a better explanation, feel free to ask. Thanks, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:53, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Wyatt 151, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Wyatt 151! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

The Celtic A.F.C.

Hello Wyatt151. Do you have any evidence that this football club is normally referred to as "Celtic A.F.C."? I checked their website and did not find anything to suggest they use that name. Also, if you go to a newspaper website such as The Guardian and do a search you probably won't find anything. Unless you have some actual data I suggest that you revert your move and go back to the former name, Celtic F.C. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 22:46, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Name

Hi EdJohnston, yes I do have confirmation of the clubs name on the official HMRC website (http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/bimmanual/bim45013.htm) . Thank you for you're time. Wyatt 151 (talk)

Where did you get the "AFC" bit from? The club's logo doesn't make any reference to an "Association Football Club", just a "Football Club". – PeeJay 01:26, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

EdJohnston If you actually looked at the link I gave you you would see it says it on the official HMRC site. Wyatt 151 (talk) 19:18, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

That was the name of the corporation that operates Celtic FC in 1983. The corporate name was changed to "Celtic plc" in 1995, when the company was floated on the stock exchange. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 19:35, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

The HMRC manual refers to a company called "Celtic Football and Athletic Co Ltd". How do you turn that into "The Celtic A.F.C."? 81.14.46.25 (talk) 20:02, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

This dispute is now resolved. Wyatt 151 (talk) 21:58, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Celtic F.C. move

Could you please revert your move on Celtic F.C. per WP:COMMONNAME. The club is known around the world as Celtic F.C. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 19:23, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Oh so Wikipedia doesn't like facts then? Wyatt 151 (talk) 19:31, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Please read WP:COMMONNAME. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 19:37, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

JMHamo OK I understand now, sorry for the dispute I thought it was only official names. I won't be moving the page anymore. Thank you. Wyatt 151 (talk) 21:51, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Why did you just move "Television licensing in the United Kingdom"?

Clearly somebody else is using your account. You can take care of that problem, I guess... Longbyte1 (talk) 04:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nz101^Userpage_Talkpage 05:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Television licensing in the United Kingdom. If you continue the disruptive and racist editing, you will be blocked. § DDima 05:50, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

What? from now on i will be good Wyatt 151 (talk) 03:47, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Black Kite kite (talk) 11:26, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wyatt 151 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Your reason is here, I never wanted to cause conflict. I've stayed away for a while from Wikipedia and now i want to make a good contribution to wikipedia. Wyatt 151 (talk) 03:35, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Under the circumstances, I don't consider your unblock request to be especially convincing. In this context, I'm declining your request to be unblocked. PhilKnight (talk) 07:19, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.