Your submission at Articles for creation: Manor House in Zglobice (December 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Wwwit! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:31, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022

edit
 

Hello Wwwit. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Manor House in Zglobice, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Wwwit. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Wwwit|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:32, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  1. But I'm not employer. I'm rather an owner of Manor. But there is not anybody who knows more about history of the manor.I'm studing it for 12 years. Looking for information, talking with people. What will change if this article will set somebody outside? He can turn information during small changes.
  2. All information about manor are historical. There are no any information about services of hotel or restaurant. There are information for people who are interesting in history. Not for advertising.
  3. All over the world historical building have new functions. Thanks to that they still are and everybody can see them. A lot of them are hotels, and are present at Wikipedia.
Wwwit (talk) 16:48, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Images

edit

Hi, I noticed that you had uploaded the images used in Draft:Manor House in Zglobice as your 'own work'. This means that you almost certainly have some connection with the article subject, and I would invite you to disclose it now. Or if you don't have any connection, and have not taken those photos yourself but used someone else's photos instead, then you shouldn't have uploaded them as your own work, and I would suggest you remove them from the article draft and arrange to have them deleted from the Commons. Grateful if you could clarify either way - thanks! -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:08, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

All of photos are my own. Nobody have photos like this about this manor. Wwwit (talk) 16:51, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Okay, then all the more so, you need to disclose your COI. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:24, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
How to do it? (disclose COI). Should I make any information? Where?
Sorry, but english language is not my first language, and I've trouble with Wikipedia law.
Could You tell me exactly where to make it to be good. Wwwit (talk) 19:01, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Wwwit. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi, based on what you've told me on my talk page, you clearly have a conflict of interest (COI), and possibly are also engaged in paid editing. I have already posted a message here about the latter, and this message now explains more about COI, and how to manage that situation. Please take a moment to disclose your COI and/or paid editing formally now, to avoid getting into any trouble over this. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:20, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manor House in Zglobice (December 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:42, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Manor House in Zglobice has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manor House in Zglobice. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:43, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Manor House in Zglobice has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manor House in Zglobice. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:15, 16 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Manor House in Zglobice has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manor House in Zglobice. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:18, 17 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manor House in Zglobice (April 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Manor House in Zglobice

edit
 

Hello, Wwwit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Manor House in Zglobice".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 23:51, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Manor House in Zglobice

edit
 

Hello, Wwwit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Manor House in Zglobice".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply