Discussion posted from Quadell's talk page now deleted

edit

Two non-free stamp questions

edit

Nature of America contains the following 9 non-free images which fail WP:NFCC#3a. How can I nominate them all together? I do suggest retaining one image to illustrate the article which is about the stamps.

The other curious situation concerns these UK tax discs used in Velology which are using the wrong template {{Non-free stamp}}. What do you suggest doing with them? They too would seem to fail WP:NFCC#3a if they really are still in copyright and I assume that the 50-year crown copyright applies so the first three might be improperly licenced when they are actually in the public domain.

  1. File:Tax Disc (1923).jpg
  2. File:Tax Disc (1952).jpg
  3. File:Tax Disc (1956).jpg
  4. File:Tax Disc (1967).jpg
  5. File:Tax Disc (1983).jpg
  6. File:Tax Disc (1985).jpg
  7. File:Tax Disc (1986).jpg
  8. File:Tax Disc (1987).jpg
  9. File:Tax Disc (1990).jpg
  10. File:Tax Disc (1992).jpg
  11. File:Tax Disc (1993).jpg
  12. File:Tax Disc (1994).jpg
  13. File:Tax Disc (1995).jpg
  14. File:Tax Disc (1996).jpg

TIA. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 04:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

You're right about the Nature of America sheets and I have nominated them for deletion. If you're curious you can see how I did it. (By the way, are you using Wikipedia:Twinkle or User:Howcheng/quickimgdelete.js to nominate these images? I hope you're not doing them manually.)
About the tax discs, I would say that they are {{PD-ineligible}}, but you might want to ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. All the best, – Quadell (talk) 13:47, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
No, not manually: I use Twinkle, otherwise I would be up all night right now. OK, with this edit I see how you merged the nominations by putting a new first heading and removing all the later individual headings. I never thought of that. For the Tax discs I will ask at WP:MCQ though both of us also hang out there so let's hope some others have some opinions. Cheers & thanks ww2censor (talk) 14:12, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Note this edit too, just to be polite. Thanks for all you do! – Quadell (talk) 14:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply