Welcome!

edit

Hello, Wpearce1983, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Lee Olesky, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Praxidicae (talk) 20:33, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Lee Olesky

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Lee Olesky, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 20:33, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

SD tag has been removed by an editor, reverting content to Draft for more work. David notMD (talk) 23:25, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Any connection to Olesky?

edit

What is your relationship/connection to Lee Olesky? Paid? Personal? If either, statement to that effect needed on your User page. If neither, say so here. David notMD (talk) 13:12, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

No connection, so no need to declare anything.

Wpearce1983 (talk) 20:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC).Reply

I have removed multiple links and instead submitted one link that is an SEC filing that made the same point. Given it's a legal document, I believe it should suffice.

You and others noted this was edited, and the changes made by others seemed wise and completely in line with the rules.

Should you have any other suggestions, please let me know. You seem to be on point with all of this.

I appreciate your help.

Wpearce1983 (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2019 (UTC).)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Wpearce1983! You created a thread called Deletion at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 8 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: Lee Olesky (December 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
JSFarman (talk) 16:21, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Wpearce1983! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 16:21, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

edit
 
Hello, Wpearce1983. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 00:28, 14 January 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Wpearce1983! You created a thread called Ongoing issues at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


New message from DESiegel

edit
 
Hello, Wpearce1983. You have new messages at Draft talk:Lee Olesky.
Message added 23:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 23:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Wpearce1983! You created a thread called Follow up on Ongoing Issues at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


Of course he is notable, but...

edit

I'm trying to make the article better, but sources are terribly lacking. For instance, the law firm he first worked at: defunct and not a trace of Zellmayer & Gratch on Google. This is really tough. Nobody talks about Tradeweb objectively and at a distance because it's so big. Who is its chief competitor? Articles on that firm might make some interesting statements about Olesky. I think that journals devoted to fixed-income e-trading would be good sources, if anyone can figure out where they are to be found.--Quisqualis (talk) 05:14, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived

edit
 

Hi Wpearce1983! You created a thread called Continued issues with page creation at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
1292simon (talk) 00:12, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Lee Olesky

edit
 

Hello, Wpearce1983. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lee Olesky".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:27, 20 November 2020 (UTC)Reply