World of Radar

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Space-based meteorological observation, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Template:Space-based meteorological observation was changed by World of Radar (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-01-25T08:05:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:05, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Space-based meteorological observation, you will be blocked from editing. -MBK₀₀₄ 09:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Geoland2, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 13:00, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Geoland2. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 13:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Geoland2.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Geoland2.pdf. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a {{hangon}} template to an article, Geoland2. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide reasoning, on the article's talk page, for why it should remain. Thank you. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:10, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Re:geoland2 article

Hi World of Radar. Although it may have not been your intent, your article, "Geoland2", read like an advertisement. Here on Wikipedia, we have a policy in which advertising/spam is speedy deleted per deletion criterion G11. Please note that articles for deletion are judged on their own merit, not in comparison to other articles. You are certainly welcome to resubmit the article, but please revise the text so that it complies with the policies and guidelines noted at WP:ADS, WP:MOS, WP:V, WP:NPOV, WP:POV, and WP:GNG; otherwise, you run the risk of having the article deleted again. Once you have resubmitted your article, you may find WP:RFF helpful; the WP:RFF noticeboard has many editors who are more than willing to give you constructive criticism on your article and/or help edit your article. FASTILY ^(TALK) 17:09, 17 August 2010 (UTC)