Wli625

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or sock puppetry.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Computational Biology and Chemistry

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Computational Biology and Chemistry, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.researchgate.net/journal/1476-9271_Computational_Biology_and_Chemistry.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 15:12, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Status and Advice

As reviewing administrator, I am going to need to do some rewriting. We do not copy from the journal page all the fields a journal says it publishes--these are typically a meaningless promotional listing of everything possible. We normally report the latest impact factor (and anything really significant, but not year to year changes. What we do include & need here is a list of editors in chief since the beginning. In the past, detailed listings of special issues have been challenged--they have usually not been accepted--tis is indexing information, and belongs on their website. I can think of some journals where they might be relevant, but just the bare external link listing is a violation of WP:EL, and I have removed it. We also normally include only the major international indexing services that are in the field of the journal. I've trimmed the list in the usual way

I understand it is the current view that in information science, h-values of journals are widely considered meaningless and I will discuss this at the talk page for the Wikiproject on academic journals (WT:WikiProject Academic Journals) in a few days. I'd normally remove such data, but I'm going to leave it here as an example for discussion. here--it was never intended as a device for ranking other than individual authors.

Please try to follow our style. The MOS is rather complicated, but one thing we avoid is bold face,especially bold face italics, except in the unique case of the first sentence of an article where it repeats the name of the subject--which, if it's a journal, will be in italics. (And, similarly, we don't make redirects to something that just redirects to the same article This applies also to the academic bios you are doing--it's good to do them; being editor in chief of a major journal is demonstration of notability for the purposes of WP - -see WP:PROF DGG ( talk ) 14:58, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Mutual information related to correlation measures for binary variables

This edit introduced the claim that "mutual information function has an exact relationship with the correlation function $p_{X=1,Y=1}-p_{X=1}p_{Y=1}$ for binary sequences". Can you elaborate? I do not have access to the cited source.

Although I can have made a mistake, by calculating and plotting pairs of correlation measures against each other for two binary variables for numerous contingency tables, there seems to be no direct relationship between the mutual information and the correlation function above or with the Pearson correlation coefficient (although the value of one often implies a bound on the value of another). —Quondum 01:57, 4 June 2017 (UTC)