Wkn96

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debjani Modak (March 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xegma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Debjani Modak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Xegma(talk) 18:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi Xegma, Thanks for taking out your valuable time and reviewing and giving your feedback. Could you please help what other reliable sources(can you please list out or attest some templates as a reference for better understanding to make the content acceptable and approvable. Thanks for the help! Wkn96 (talk) 18:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Wkn96! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Xegma(talk) 18:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Debjani Modak (May 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No real improvement since Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Debjani_Modak

Qcne (talk) 11:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Wkn96, sorry I have to reject this draft. The Times of India really is unreliable for entertainment subjects so should not be used, and that just leaves mostly non-independent Youtube clips. Qcne (talk) 11:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)