Winebloom

External linking

Please don't add blog sites to articles. They are do not qualify for inclusion under the reliable sources guideline on Wikipedia. Thanks. -Amatulić (talk) 19:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

External links

The Indonesian project has articles that have links that are in Indonesian - rather than remove them - they should either identified that they are in Indonesian - or be checked for their validity in relation to the article - please do not remove 'just because they are in Indonesian' most internet users are now able to access translation pages and software - so the existence of such links is not an issue - the relevance within the ppolicy on External links is the issue SatuSuro 13:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation. Winebloom (talk) 14:04, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

No probs because there is no clear policy outlined at either the Indonesian project page, or in a main space page in wikipedia english to say that this is the case - some are plain WP:SPAM and should be removed - it all depends on the policies of External links - and the capacity to evaluate the relevance of the link to the article. It can get very messy with some Indonesian speaking eds adding only Indonesian materials to articles - and they do not constitute valid WP:RS for an articles WP:N - but the eds seem to assume it is because their english is not good enough to find good 3rd party sources in english - it gets worse I can tell you! SatuSuro 14:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for For abusing multiple accounts per checkuser. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Avi (talk) 04:47, 15 December 2008 (UTC)