Window Duck15

Your submission at Articles for creation: GOMC theory (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GOMC theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:GOMC theory, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Window Duck15! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:04, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:GOMC theory

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Draft:GOMC theory, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello, I'm UnsungKing123. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Aztec society have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. UnsungKing123 (talk) 21:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander Hamilton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

• Disruptive edit reverted. Insertion of Lams shipping (fandom) content related to Hamilton (musical), conforms to common Hamiltrash pattern of vandalism. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 18:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sandwich, you may be blocked from editing. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 18:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander Hamilton. Favonian (talk) 18:47, 10 December 2018 (UTC)