Wimvegt01
|
Welcome!
editHello, Wimvegt01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
August 2013
editHello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Geon (physics) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- eNtity|electromagnetic wave confined by its own gravitational field]] [ (physics)|field]] [[energy]]. They were first investigated theoretically in 1955 by [[John Archibald Wheeler|J. A.
- * {{cite journal | last1 = Vegt | first1 = Wim J. | title=A Continuous Model of Matter based on AEONS|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Wimvegt01, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi Wimvegt01! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of AEONS (Electromagnetic), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Gravitational ElectrOmagnetic eNtity. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 01:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of AEONS (Electromagnetic)
editHello Wimvegt01,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged AEONS (Electromagnetic) for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[:{{{article}}}]].
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. anamedperson (talk) 02:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Removing Speedy at AEONS (Electromagnetic)
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.
I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.
If you don't want the article to get deleted, please click here.
The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.
We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 02:09, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
The article Electromagnetic entity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- original research or very close to it
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:34, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Wimvegt01,
It seems to me that an article you worked on, Physics Essays, may be copied from http://physicsessays.com/. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.
It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.
Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 10:11, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Electromagnetic entity for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electromagnetic entity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electromagnetic entity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:02, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Wimvegt01. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article AEON (electromagnetic), you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Flat Out let's discuss it 13:07, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
Please sign your contributions to AfD discussions
editHello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 01:33, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, are you the same person as Harold25 (talk · contribs) ? -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 01:49, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello, are you the same person as 86.92.205.212 (talk · contribs) ? If you are not, then 86.92.205.212 deleted your AfD comment with this edit [1] -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 01:54, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
AEON (electromagnetic) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) & Electromagnetic entity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
editHello, Wimvegt01. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article AEON (electromagnetic), you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 01:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)