WimdeValk
Welcome! edit
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Banana 23:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
.
|
|
The move you made was a bit controversial, and was reversed. For future reference, it's a good idea to propose major moves on an article's talk page first, before making them. :) —Piet Delport 03:22, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Citation of references in Digital electronics edit
I inserted the {{Unreferenced}} tag in this article because the references are not cited (particularly see Text-source relationship). Though there is some flexibility in this matter, clearly no references were cited.
This issue seems a little murky to me and I have initiated a discussion at Template_talk:Unreferenced.
It is generally considered appropriate, when removing a tag such as this one without other editing, to start a discussion on the talk page.
One thing I have been doing is inserting citations to references in articles with the {{Unreferenced}} tag and then replacing the {{Unreferenced}} tag with a {{refimprove}} tag. No one has yelled at me for this, yet.
I have tagged many articles as {{Unreferenced}} and you are the first to delete the tag without editing the reference citations.
Though the references for this article are good ones (I have taught digital logic from Katz) I think the sections of this article need to direct the reader to specific information that verifies and expands the information in those sections. Some statements in this article are not supported by Katz or Lala but the inference is that these references support all statements in this article.
I am also starting a discussion in Talk:Digital electronics about this. Please contribute there if you like.
Softtest123 16:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
- My interpretation of the unreferenced tag text is that the article is supposed to contain no references at all. Whether or not your interpretation about the missing citations to the references in this text would formally be correct, it may still cause people to get confused about it. So I support Dicklion's solution of replacing it by the unambiguous citation tag. WimdeValk 18:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Use of EDASeeAlso Template edit
TO WimdeValk The community is better served by text, and not a template. This template is not applicable.... and cannot be edited for this article only as it is template. I have already suggested putting specific links and specific appropriate conference rather than using a template. Placing this template across many EDA topics is not helpful. TeamX 23:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Karnaugh map edit
Hoi Wim,
Kun je mij misschien vertellen, waarom je in het artikel Karnaugh map de link naar Commons weer verwijderd hebt? -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 23:04, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
P.S. Ik zie net dat je niet zo actief bent. In de tussentijd zet ik de link weer terug, en wacht je antwoord af. Gegroet.
- Dag Marcel,
- Eigenlijk was het een kwestie van onoplettendheid van mij. Ik zocht naar het effect van de link in de tekst maar zag de link aan de rechterkant over het hoofd, zodat ik dacht dat er iets fout mee was. Sorry dus. WimdeValk (talk) 10:04, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- Ok bedankt. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 11:30, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
computation universal edit
Alas, I reverted one of your edits to the logic gate article. I hope my excuses at Talk:Logic_gate#computation_universal makes sense. --68.0.124.33 (talk) 04:57, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit
Hello, WimdeValk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, WimdeValk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit
Hello, WimdeValk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |