User talk:RickinBaltimore/Archive 4

(Redirected from User talk:Wildthing61476/Archive 4)
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Angrysusan in topic Thanks

Woolerball edit

I dont understand why this article keeps being deleted is it being vandalised. if so could you help me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by S0456769 (talkcontribs) 20:55, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Out of interest why are you deemed to be able to decide if an article is notable or not.

Furhter you are wrong about it just being made up one day but because you have deleted the article it leaves no chance for its improvement and ultimately proving you to have made an error in your decsion to delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by S0456769 (talkcontribs) 21:05, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

I take your point, however if you keep deleting the article it gives no time for anyone to address the concerns that were raised. If you had kept it up you would have found this out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by S0456769 (talkcontribs) 21:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

example of better report edit

You filed a SSP on Moral Victor. I also saw it on ANI. May I suggest that you write a short description rather than simply state that they are socks? The next SSP may be an example where it describes why the two people are socks. It says

Jsb394 is a representative of One Economy Corporation. They confirmed that they were 208.118.160.122, which is registered to One Economy Corporation. They created Rey Ramsey and Alec Ross (Social Entrepreneur). Several days after they their COI came to light, they stopped editing. Later the same day the new editor Mosquito0016 started editing the One Economy Corporation related articles. Almost all of the Mosquito0016 edits have been to these articles.

It's not too complicated but is very helpful. Mrs.EasterBunny (talk) 16:15, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Somebody else helped you! It's now a very detailed report, much more detailed than I was expecting! Mrs.EasterBunny (talk) 16:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Feloni DRV edit

You recently participated in the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feloni (2nd nomination). As you may or may not know, the deletion discussion recently went to Deletion Review, (discussion,) and the result of the review was to relist the AfD for a third, and hopefully final time. I invite you to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Feloni (3rd nomination), so that we can finally come to consensus. -- RoninBK T C 16:57, 10 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Blind man`s bluff edit

G4? -- lucasbfr talk 20:32, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

just in case it reappears: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blind mans bluff ( movie ). But since it got speedied G4 is not valid ;). -- lucasbfr talk 20:36, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Thanks, yes, I saw it.. but a normal content dispute, and I think it would be best if the other, rather specialised editor had someone else tactfully urge him towards the talkpage, so I'll hold off replying for a bit. Besides, I have another 30 BLPs I want to clean up today.... Relata refero (talk) 18:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Are you a bot??? edit

Why do you keep beating me to the punch in warning authors of CSD candidate articles??? It's most frustrating; I'm a big boy, I can handle it by myself! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

This may be the pot calling the kettle black, but shouldn't work keep you busy at work??? ;-) - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! edit

Thanks for the quick revert on my talk page! It is greatly appreciated! --TeaDrinker (talk) 18:20, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey edit

Nominating an article for speedy deletion 1 minute after the first edit was made on it? That was a bit offsides don't you think? Not to be a dick about it, but happy trigger fingers like that is what often causes new users to post nasty messages and even leave the project. Just some food for thought. I re-created the article - feel free to help out on it if you want. --Yankees76 (talk) 22:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

You Me At Six edit

  1. 2, but not on the national chart. WP:BAND is pretty vague as to which charts qualify, but this one is less than major. --AndrewHowse (talk) 01:56, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

THANKS edit

Thankks whoever sent me this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conniedebra (talkcontribs) 15:42, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

FRIENDS edit

Hey do you want to be friends?I really like your friendlyness.ARe you a girl? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conniedebra (talkcontribs) 15:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

???? edit

Wildthing61476 why didn't you respond to my last message I sent you?

== ok! ==

STill DO you want to be friends on wikipedia?

[[Image:WOW I can't beleive you are really this nice.If someone tell you I like Justin Smalla's from high school don't listen to them I single I wanted you to Know do you have a girlfriend?I might change my user mame but if I do I'll get back at you.Ant way how you get to why Malcom X was Important?Oh!How old are you what grade are you in?

Thanks. edit

Thank you for the revert on my talk page. · AndonicO Hail! 17:14, 16 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

why? edit

can you help me get to the main purpose of Malcom X?Please email me A.S.A.P. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conniedebra (talkcontribs) 16:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

mean edit

I mean why is he important? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conniedebra (talkcontribs) 16:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

important!!!!!!! edit

I mean why is he important in black history?Oh you still didn't answer my question how old are you what grade are you in?Please email me A.S.A.P.!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conniedebra (talkcontribs) 12:04, February 18, 2008

Dear Wildthing,

I think we are in the midst of a misunderstanding over my article on Jordan Morelli. I realize the article is not yet backed by sources, but the sources are currently away due to the holiday today. Jordan Morelli has been a long-standing figure in the community and he deserves recognition. I believe the 145 residents of the neighbourhood will agree.

change edit

oh let's get something straight I'm only 11 so don't try anythng.Oh I don't need information on Malcom X any more you can give me little information on Maya Angelou that's who I'm doing Now.My teacher apperciates your help on my report.I'm in the sixth grade.--Conniedebra (talk) 16:45, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Big Mama's Meatloaf Shack edit

Wikiediting while working is like watch repair while driving. Rereading the text, I'm wrong, you're right, have a cookie on me! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Deus Ex Machina edit

Please don't delete my article it is verey important. I am not the creator of the serie of videos but they are very popular so please reasearch the matter —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigroc (talkcontribs) 18:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Deus Ex Machina article edit

 

If you want to see any notablity look at these links to prove deus ex machina is popular

http://ie.youtube.com/user/machinima

http://www.machinima.com/film/view&id=24642

watching the second link will prove it's notability yall —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigroc (talkcontribs) 13:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the cookie! edit

I didn't actually expect to get one :). I didn't even know there was an ANI thread on that Afd, stumbled into it. Anywho, I appreciate it! Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:43, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Win the Ultimate Prom edit

I don't understand why this article is tagged for speedy deletion. It's not blatant advertising, and I don't work for the company- I am trying to get my fellow students to participate so we can raise 25,000$ without selling candy- a worthy cause. Its a national contest, and you already have competing projects (the ultimate prom night) as wiki articles... it doesn't seem consistent. What makes this different than a wiki article about a television show? They're all advertisements for a commercial product, but if they have public interest as a pop culture reference, they should be included here, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanda5876 (talkcontribs) 15:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Win the Ultimate Prom edit

I guess I'm looking for some advise on what constitutes "blatant advertisement" since there are so many articles on wiki that are exactly like mine, infact advertising similar contests (Referenced before). If something becomes part of pop culture, isn't that cause for a wiki article?

As for lifting it from the site, I actually wrote it, but it is based on the stuff on the site, but from the "idea bank", which is there for people to use for such purposes. Infact, there are downloads there explicitly stating that everything is usable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanda5876 (talkcontribs) 15:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Win the Ultimate Prom edit

Hi.. thanks for the comment back. so here is the Ultimate Prom night article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ultimate_Prom_Nite

and here are 3rd party references http://www.azcentral.com/community/ahwatukee/citizen/articles/0924ar-nbyprom0926.html http://www.neighborsgo.com/stories/11585 http://prom365.com/labels/Win.html http://www.myhighschooljournalism.org/az/phoenix/dv/article.cfm?eid=10294&aid=156252

there are more, just google it, but here are a few to start. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanda5876 (talkcontribs) 17:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Win the Ultimate Prom edit

Actually, the school was NOT sponsoring the event, they won the event, that's why they were writing about it. I chose links that were not written by employees, sponsors or promoters. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanda5876 (talkcontribs) 17:45, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

DC Meetup on May 17th edit

Your help is needed in planning Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 4! Any comments or suggestions you have are greatly appreciated. The Placebo Effect (talk) 20:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

"Duck Test" edit

Oh I get it now, I got sort of misunderstood hehe. Thanks for clearing it up. Momusufan (talk) 20:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Non-admin closure edit

To close an AfD, you put the following at the top:

{{subst:at}} '''Keep/delete/merge/whatever the result was''', followed by an explanation of your closure. ~~~~

And the following at the bottom:

{{subst:ab}}

I have no idea where I learned that from. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 18:09, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to jump in here, (and I'm not sure why you're in my watchlist Wildthing...hmmm. Did you do something very wrong or very right?) Anyway, TPH has it right. He doesn't know where he got it though, but I do! The "deletion process", including how to close an AfD (there are more steps than TPH gave you, such as how to relist), can be found at the shortcut WP:DELPRO#AFD. Of course, you should only close obvious keeps, as per WP:NAC, but the delpro page also gives you helpful reminders that you need to remove the AfD notification tag from the kept article, as well as go to the talkpage of the kept article and add the oldafdfull" tag. Hope that helps! Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 18:41, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Velossa Raptors... edit

Hi wildthing (i was quite amazed when i read this as wildthing is my last name!)

I was just wondering why the Velossa Raptors page my Girlfriend made was deleted...

I'm sure she will be talking to you about this soon.

Please don't delete the page, it meets all the needs of an article (in wikipedia).

Thankyou...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kieran100-proper (talkcontribs) 20:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can you please edit

Can you please show me a wiki article on a company that has been saved because it has something notable about it? What exactly would "notable" be? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by UrbanRoots (talkcontribs) 20:27, 25 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy Deletion Nonsense tags edit

I thought I'd just copy let you know what I was informed of the other day by User:Cobaltbluetony on my talk page. I removed the speedy tag because the definition of patent nonsense is as follows

1. Total nonsense, i.e., text or random characters that have no assignable meaning at all. This includes sequences such as "rtmhtyhjjflbhjoglhjgblvjh\[\\\\98kjt9ykbitiof,kkc", in which keys of the keyboard have been pressed with no regard for what is typed.
2. Content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever.

The pages you have added the nonsense tag too are no necessarily nonsense in that sense. Other tags may be more appropriate, as some admins refused to delete speedy nominations that have been tagged inappropriately. Thanks --Eastlygod (talk) 14:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're right, I didn't see the edit history. I know what you mean though, sometimes there just isn't the right category for articles. Technically, if someone had created a page claiming to have invented the internet, for example, you have to go through a PROD deletion, as if true, he is notable, though obviously a joke. Ridiculous really... --Eastlygod (talk) 14:42, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism? edit

Do you really think that the edit you reverted was vandalism? The link seems legit, it seemed to have been made in good faith. If anything, its an advert site, but it contains lotsa info about Ibiza. Thoughts? - Arcayne (cast a spell) 18:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I didn't interpret it as such, but I imagine it's less important to debate, as the info from those sites might be able to cull some citations from. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 19:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not Vandalism edit

Have you read Wiki's definition of vandalism? Adding facts that is supported by substance is not vandalism, even if you disagree with them. Next time at least read and check on what was added before you claim something is vandalism.

Not Vandalism edit

Have you read Wiki's definition of vandalism? Adding facts that is supported by substance is not vandalism, even if you disagree with them. Next time at least read and check on what was added before you claim something is vandalism.DFZ (talk) 12:55, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Do your due diligence first edit

Yes why don't you read the link I put in. Google it too.DFZ (talk) 13:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Talk Page Vandal edit

I reverted some vandalism on your talk page. It's possibly related to this. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks edit

Must have been 10 CSD and Trolling my page as an anon and new user. I told him AfD it. Igor Berger (talk) 18:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I prod'd it, and then AFD'd it. Show me ONCE where I did a CSD. Please. show. me. Angrysusan (talk) 18:51, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
here under User:128.36.147.198 before you created your user id.
That link is to one your removals of a talk page message. That IP address shows not edits where a CSD was placed on this article. You're wrong, just admit it. Angrysusan (talk) 19:06, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply