WP:Cricket

edit

Hello,

If you interested in cricket, why don't you join WP:Cricket. Tintin 15:57, 28 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

West Horndon

edit

Well, as I said in the edit summary, it is written in the style of stream of consciousness, which is good for literary experiments but doesn't make good reading. Some points

  • It is all one paragraph. Paragraph breaks are good.
  • What there is doesn't appear to be in any particular order. Modern information is mixed with historical information.
  • There is nothing that says what it actually is. Articles should start with something like "X is a town in Y, close to Z, with a population of X."
  • The use of "we find" and suchforth.
  • It is too much like a narrative.

Basically the info there is (mostly) good and relevant - I'd question whether certain things are actually verifiable - but the actual prose needs tearing apart and rewriting in a totally different style. I suggest you look at the articles in the Category:Villages in Buckinghamshire for examples of treatments of villages, those are generally pretty good prose.

I hope you don't think I'm being overly harsh - you did ask ;). Morwen - Talk 20:44, 11 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:TLine.png

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:TLine.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Reply