Wikiseal123

Working on your draft edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, I just wanted to drop you a note, letting you know that your continual resubmission of Draft:Www.SEALFIT.com without actually making any productive changes is considered tenditious and could result in administrative action taken against you. Please work to improve the draft before resubmitting. Thanks. If you want more help, stop by the Teahouse, Wikipedia's live help channel, or the help desk to ask someone for assistance. To reply directly to me, start your message with {{u|Primefac}}. Primefac (talk) 19:45, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: SealFit (April 3) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unchanged as it's still unsatisfactory in main policy WP:What Wikipedia is not.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SealFit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 20:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Apology edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, Wikiseal123 I wanted to apologize for being WP:BITEY yesterday, I was frustrated with the promotional nature and am used to often seeing promo with no hopes of becoming encyclopedic, so i'd like to sincerely apologize for that. I'd also like to give you some thoughts on your draft and offer some assistance. Here are some decent sources (in my opinion) that you could start with:

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:04, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic