Your submission at Articles for creation: Init (September 30)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SemiHypercube was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SemiHypercube 01:15, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Wikiposteryolo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SemiHypercube 01:15, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Hello. I removed a large paragraph you added to the Douglas K. Amdahl article because there was no citation of a source. It may be added back with reliable references. If you would like help with that, please let me know. Jonathunder (talk) 21:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Init

edit
 

Hello, Wikiposteryolo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Init".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:25, 6 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Kevin G. Ross

edit

Hello, Wikiposteryolo,

Thank you for creating Kevin G. Ross.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The "Marriage and Divorce" and "Judicial Tenure" sections are overwhelmingly negative. Please be careful in observing our neutral point of view policy, especially as this is a biography on a living person.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John M Wolfson}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 04:03, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

@John M Wolfson: This is all true and verifiable. He is a public official. Citations are all quality:

https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/court-of-appeals/2014/a13-611.html https://ballotpedia.org/Kevin_Ross_(Minnesota)

Nomination of Kevin G. Ross for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin G. Ross is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin G. Ross until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 04:18, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Sophia y. vuelo

edit
 

The article Sophia y. vuelo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject is a non-notable local judge

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kablammo (talk) 13:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

BLP

edit

Wikiposteryolo, many of your edits violate Wikipedia policies. Please review WP:BLP, WP:RS, WP:NOR, and WP:UNDUE. Articles on individuals must be fair and based on reliable, third-party sources, and cannot contain your characterizations of the subject or the subject's actions. Wikipedia is not a place to right individual wrongs. If you continue to reinsert material in articles which violate these policies, your editing privileges can be revoked. Kablammo (talk) 14:43, 29 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

AfD

edit

I have nominated your Judge Vuelo's article for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Y. Vuelo. Kablammo (talk) 16:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply