February 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm TarnishedPath. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Adem Somyurek have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. TarnishedPathtalk 04:09, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Introduction to contentious topics edit

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

TarnishedPathtalk 04:10, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

CS1 error on Adem Somyurek edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Adem Somyurek, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:42, 9 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

WP:BLP/N edit

I have started a discussion concerning a matter which you are involved in at Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Adem Somyurek TarnishedPathtalk 03:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Wikinonsensical. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Adem Somyurek, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Bilby (talk) 08:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for ongoing editing without disclosing a conflict of interest., as you did at Adem Somyurek.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bilby (talk) 13:15, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Adem Somyurek edit

Hi, Please do not continue to remove sourced content from the article, with no explanation and no discussion like you did in Special:Diff/1208676162. Regards, TarnishedPathtalk 13:15, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply