User talk:Wikimol/Archive 1

Latest comment: 18 years ago by Pschemp in topic Thanks but

Archive edit

Finaly I created an account :)

As I had allready contributed to several Polish/German warfield articles... :-(

  • Before I had set up my account, I had contrubited as User:81.27.192.18, User:81.27.192.19, User:81.27.192.16 and maybe some other from that IP range. So, please, save me various accusations of beeing sock puppet etc.
  • I'm Czech nationality. I have little sympathy for nationalism of any nationality, nevertheless sometimes I may try to describe Czech POV (trying to keep the decription itself to be NPOV). Or German POV, or German nationalist POV. So, please, save me from various ad hominum argumentats.

No - the link [[Nazi Germany|Germany]] wouldn't be the slightestly disturbing if it weren't for the wikipedia-context of anti-German bias, which I by the way consider understandable and in general justified, although not at wikipedia striving for NPOV.

By the way: Welcome as an identificable wikipedian!
--Ruhrjung 11:11, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Please don't masquerade changes to articles with incorrect edit summaries. If you want to make a POV change to an article such as Erika Steinbach, be so good as to tell us in the edit summary that you're doing so. RickK 22:33, 18 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

Please consider http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Erika_Steinbach&diff=0&oldid=3681741 at Talk:Erika Steinbach
--Ruhrjung 01:07, 22 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

Accented characters in interwiki links edit

Be careful; when you changed the accents on "thé" and "Chá" in the French and Portuguese interlangauge links in the Tea article, you broke them; those wikis use accents customarily in titling pages, unlike the English wikipedia, and require the accents in the links to function, unless someone has created a redirect. -- कुक्कुरोवाच|Talk‽ 07:30, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Pursuit of Nazi collaborators edit

Ahoj! Just read Pursuit of Nazi collaborators. Good job. It's a good entry. Maybe someday I will add a section about Belarus. -- rydel 14:49, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)

You might like to look at the changes I've made. I did a simlar thing thing to Historical Eastern Germany a few months ago and I think that is a much bettter article now. This one still needs work, but at least I hope that I have re-focused the page. Philip Baird Shearer 22:56, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Reading the Czechoslovakian section, which I think is think is the best section in the article, it might be worth redefining the date a citizen of the Riech at the start of the article to the day before the invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1938. I will leave you to suggest that if you think it important. Philip Baird Shearer 23:15, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

translation edit

Care to take on the one exisiting Czech-to-English translation request? -- Jmabel 21:43, Sep 17, 2004 (UTC)

English edit

I think your English is quite good. -- Viriditas 09:43, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Endorsements page edit

Dobry' Den Wikimol--

Sorry to bother/spam you, but I thought you might like to actually vote on the format for the endorsements page on its talk page. I'm posting this message as Michael Snow apparently forgot to include you when lobbying for the survey. Na shledanou!--FeloniousMonk 06:48, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

--

excusez moi, vous etes qui? Quel sont les mensonges que vous avez envoyez? Est-ce-qu'il y a de problems? S'il vous plait vous devez parler en francais si vous allez continuer d'envoyer ces mensonges. (by User:81.56.104.13, sign by Wikimol)

Hey Wikimol, I don't think I know French well enough to communicate with a native speaker - but it is possible that this person is not French at all, judging by what they wrote above... Adam Bishop 19:14, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Oh, the person certainly isn't French. I'm pretty sure this is the guy (that's his VfD'd vanity page). Incidentially Wikimol, he continues to remove the VfD headers from his pages (Caleb York and GMNASAC) and blank the VfD pages, despite you giving him a final warning. No doubt he will re-create the pages once they've been deleted as well. PLEASE block this guy! David Johnson 12:39, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Puppies edit

I am also quick to remove any mention of the Puppy Blender incident as it relates to Glenn Reynolds or Instapundit--which is stupid because if people are so intent on adding that info, it must be important and should be left alone.

Bring back quickpolls edit

I think it's time that quickpolls be re-evaluated as a solution to short term disputes between users. What say you? --Ryan! | Talk 05:21, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)

Panelak edit

Thank you for your additions to the panelak article. Your English is very good! Mwalcoff 18:58, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Roma people edition edit

Dear Wikimol,

I have received a notice from you. The article "Roma (people)" seems to be monopolyzed by Mr. Pavel Vozenilek, who I consider is not impartial and pretends to be the only editor of that page. He has deleted my comments and external links. If you tell me how to put the notice that the article is disputed, I'll thank you, because his information reflects only his point of view, discarding any other position. He has demonstrated that he has no knowledge of Romany culture and language (I have written to him in Romany and he cannot understand), but follows the opinion of some researchers.

Information about a Requests for arbitration edit

I started Request of Arbitration due to insults from User:Sumnakay. Since you are knowledgeable of the situation, you may add qualified statement there. Pavel Vozenilek 28 June 2005 22:26 (UTC)

The guy with the long name edit

I have replied to your question on the Swedish Embasy. Basicly, the history isn't an urban legend. Gunnar Larsson 23:06, 13 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Usercat edit

You were listed in the Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Czech Republic page as living in or being associated with Czech Republic. As part of the Wikipedia:User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Czech Republic for instructions.Rmky87 09:07, 17 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

RFC on User:85.38.174.138 edit

Yes, I would. However, please be aware that it might take a while for me to notice the RFC and take action (i.e. co-sign) because of my schedule and time zone. So please drop me a line on my talk page when you submit the RFC -- and don't lose your patience. :-) --Gutza T T+ 17:06, 5 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Tea FARC edit

Hi. I was the person who nominated Tea for FARC. I just noticed that you started to make major improvements, so I withdrew my nomination. I still hope you will really give the article a good copyedit/reorganization. I won't have time to note every change you make, so I probably won't have standing to renominate this for FARC again. Saravask 23:22, 23 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Featured Picture edit

 
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Lorenz attractor yb.svg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. ~~~~

Congratulations, and thankyou for making it for us. It's nice to see a mathematical FP. Raven4x4x 03:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

WorldStatesmen link & Sudetenland edit

I'd removed [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sudetenland&diff=prev&oldid=35160501 this] link in the past and had dispute with User:Fastifex (I got too emotional there). I have feeling Fastifex has quite good contributions aabout history elsewhere and do not understand why he's pushing this website that much. Pavel Vozenilek 22:24, 15 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Prague-castle-charles-bridge.jpeg listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Prague-castle-charles-bridge.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

dbenbenn | talk 23:22, 30 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks but edit

Thanks I prefer not be involved with extreme nationalistic views. pschemp | talk 17:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)Reply