Wikijac

Welcome!

Hello, Wikijac, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!   Will Beback  talk  22:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

PS: I'm going to move your addition to Rand cam engine to the article talk page.[1] Comments don't really belong in articles.   Will Beback  talk  22:17, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Jacques Gauvin

User pages beling in "user space", which all has "user" in the title. If you think that Jacques Gauvin is notable enough for an article (see WP:BIO for the criteria, then you can start an article at Jacques Gauvin. Or, if you want to have a different user name then you can abandon this account and start a new one.   Will Beback  talk  01:33, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

I see the Gauvin article has been created and deleted once already. Unless there is a new claim of notability I don't advise you recreating it.   Will Beback  talk  01:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

How Wikipedia works

• "Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required.
• Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
• We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology. -- Indeed, Wikipedia is not for any kind of promotion.
• A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. -- If you are not mentioned in sources independent of you, then you are not notable
• Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment). -- Your own website does not count as a source for almost any purpose on this site.
• Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence. In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.

Ian.thomson (talk) 04:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)