Wikidu591

February 2012

Hello Wikidu591 and welcome to Wikipedia. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. SudoGhost 18:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Adrenaline Mob, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. SudoGhost 03:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adrenaline Mob, you may be blocked from editing. SudoGhost 04:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adrenaline Mob, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:17, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikidu591 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I strongly feel I should be unblocked because I had no malicious intent in my editing of the Adrenaline Mob page. Just becase really skilled players from other bands form a new band, they aren't automatically a supergroup. It's a term that gets thrown around way too loosely. They should have to achieve some sort of long-term success as a band before earning the label, "supergroup." Wikidu591 (talk) 04:51, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I think that the problem here is that you seem to think your opinion or your interpretation is in any way important to Wikipedia. It isn't; we can only go by what reliable soures say. So, if reliable sources say some band is a supergroup, your opinion and my opinion are simply irrelevant. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:06, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.