Wikicleaner2

PRos User:Wikicleaner2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikicleaner2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here

Decline reason:

You're not blocked, at least not directly Jac16888^Talk 19:28, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Oh right. Im blocked unless i log in. Thats wot i meantWikicleaner2 (talk) 20:04, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Leave a message for me, Wikicleaner. I will respond to it as soon as poss

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Syrthiss (talk) 14:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikicleaner2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I simply have not vandalised using this account, simple as that.

Decline reason:

Ah, but you did. Simple as that. --Jayron32 21:34, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Either this [1] was you, or your account is compromised. Which is it?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:04, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

He won't be able to see that - here is brief summary 13:59, 19 November 2010 . . Wikicleaner2 (29 bytes) (←Created page Arsalick with 'HAI GUISE I LICK ASS BINSh.')  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:16, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

? No, I can confirm I didn't create that page. Wikicleaner2 (talk) 17:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikicleaner2 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I've helped countless times on many pages, and if the only reason is (←Created page Arsalick with 'HAI GUISE I LICK ASS BINSh.'), then I am going to carry on appealing. My account is probably compromised.

Decline reason:

There seemed to be quite a few other problematic edits. Since you've offered no other indications that you comprehend the reason for your block despite many unblock requests, I've removed your ability to edit this page. Kuru (talk) 17:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Libfat for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Libfat is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Libfat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 11:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)