SPEAK.to.ME

RE:Black Rainbow

edit

Hey! I saw your link on ATRL, so I decided to check it out. I'll read through it and try to throw some sources your way if I find them. You can tweet me at @VampyreLace if you want also :D --Thevampireashlee (talk) 01:20, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Excellent job on Mannequin Factory! I fixed a few minor errors already. I'm reading through the rest of the article now. :D --Thevampireashlee (talk) 01:03, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Half the time I feel like we know more about her than she does. Lol. At any rate, I think we might've taken her tweets slightly out of context. Those tweets were obviously songs she had recorded (and finished, hopefully) with Red. Since there are only 13 or 14 songs, we can assume that maybe 2 -4 more will be recorded? Also, although she said on television the album was called "Mannequin Factory", I have a feeling she'll change her mind about that too xD. Thank god for redirects. :D Hey, Naughty Naughty looks great now! Wouldn't be so hard to find places for the images and music if there was more text. Who knows, maybe when the album drops we'll get more interviews and such. *fingers crossed* --Thevampireashlee (talk) 21:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
I agree with you on that one. Although I have noticed some of those sites used on songs for Britney Spears and other big name artists. Although the sites themselves are likely unreliable, they're publishing word-for-word (more or less) an interview with Porcelain, so it has to be somewhat credible, you know? :P --Thevampireashlee (talk) 22:18, 21 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
I already KNEW you were writing the article for that song! :) Looks good. Can't wait to see it in its finished form. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 16:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

BeyHive

edit

An article you have contributed to on BeyHive has been archived in case of deletion at a link that I am not supposed to tell you because it's spam. Please message or email me if you wish to hear about my Wikia site.

Thanks,
Mike James Michael DuPont (talk) 21:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeyHive

edit

Hello there. I note that you recently !voted to Keep the article BeyHive at the aforementioned AfD because of the sources found by  (talk · contribs). Since the user has actually provided the sources, a source analysis has cast doubt on the claims that they demonstrate notability for inclusion. As these sources were not provided when you first cast your !vote, you may wish to reassess your view in light of recent developments. Thanks, SplashScreen (talk) 21:37, 7 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Swallow My Bullet for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swallow My Bullet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swallow My Bullet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fixer23 (talk) 23:16, 25 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mannequin Factory

edit

Hey! Do you still edit here? I nominated Mannequin Factory, This Is What Rock n' Roll Looks Like, and Go! Pop! Bang! for good article hood. Wanna check them out and help me make the necessary changes when they've been evaluated? I know you've helped me work on at least two of those articles. Let's make them perf for Porcelain. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 03:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:BestInk MannequinFactory falsealbum.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BestInk MannequinFactory falsealbum.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 07:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mannequin Factory for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mannequin Factory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mannequin Factory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Chase (talk / contribs) 21:02, 17 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:BestInk MannequinFactory falsealbum.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:BestInk MannequinFactory falsealbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:39, 25 December 2014 (UTC)Reply