WikiRonnie

Welcome!

Hello, WikiRonnie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as ATEasy, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Pesky (talk …stalk!) 09:07, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ATEasy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ATEasy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 09:07, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

[[[User:WikiRonnie|WikiRonnie]] (talk)}Why was it delete? what copyright? Where is the ATEasy page? What can I do to restore correct the problem? I'm new to Wikipidia.

I placed the page in my user page for review. please let me know what's wrong.

14:01, 23 September 2011 Panyd (talk | contribs) deleted "ATEasy" ‎ (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.irazoo.com/InterestingTopics/ateasy.aspx). irazoo.comn is not a st a search engine. So what copyright issue is there?

To be honest, I can't see one. The text of the article is at irazoo, but it's quoting the Wikipedia article. There is another issue for the article, however. A version was deleted at AfD, so it must be shown now that this version is either not the same, or has addressed the problems. I'll just look into that now. Peridon (talk) 18:55, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Hey there, firstly, let me say, my mistake. The website does certainly appear to have been quoting Wikipedia. However, looking through it this does appear to be a recreation of deletion material by consensus. Please do correct me again if I am wrong. Once again, my apologies for my mistake. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 18:59, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

I'd be obliged if you'd have a look at the differences, too. (I've made that same mistake myself - easy to do if you're distracted or hungry...) To me they two versions don't look all that different, but I can't see why it's been described as promotional, and there's at least one decent looking link. Make that at least a couple. The refs are all to Geotest and I wouldn't describe them as refs. Could be wrong. Feeling in need of pizza and listening to Laura Marling doesn't help concentration. Peridon (talk) 19:09, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

{WikiRonnie (talk) 19:26, 23 September 2011 (UTC)} What about the external links? They are IEEE and Nasa Tech Brief magazine. These are all reliable sources. I don't think it promotional since no benefits of using the product are mentioned, just facts that are known to me being an ATEasy user for many years. Any suggestion to restore instead of deleting it? Thanks.

Just a point of style - could you sign at the end of your posts not the start? It's not compulsory, so far as I know, but it makes it easier to see. I'm hoping Panyd will come back in - she's been adminning longer than me. Peridon (talk) 19:51, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

She has - on her page. I agree with what she says. Try to get away from the old wording, and make the refs to something non-company. Avoid 'download' things, and see if you can find free versions of the IEEEE(EE?)lost count... ones. Not compulsory - easier for those of us with wallets that say 'Property of E. Scrooge' on them prefer free. Good luck. Put DRAFT at the top. Peridon (talk) 20:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

There is nothing wrong with this or the original article. Panyd deleted it with the wrong argument. I can change the reference to a mirror site (http://geotest.fileburst.com/downloads/ATEasy8GettingStarted.pdf ) and the page it a but but I think it good as is. It's really discouraging... {WikiRonnie (talk) 19:38, 26 September 2011 (UTC)}

I made some change to the [ATEasy] page currently located under my user profile. I reword, added some content, added DRAFT on top, and provided a references to the actual manuals instead of downloads. Can I post the page back? How do I get others to review? {WikiRonnie (talk) 18:03, 28 September 2011 (UTC)}

OK. Don't. You didn't take on board about references. (I'm sure I mentioned refs - I'm ALWAYS going on about refs.) Read WP:RS and work out what's wrong with your article (well, maybe the first thing that's wrong - I haven't looked further...) Peridon (talk) 18:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

{WikiRonnie} I did. Check the reference section. This is really frustrating....Help, anyone?

Well, the sources are primary. Wikipedia articles should be sourced from secondary sources where possible. Primary sources are usually not as reliable nor as neutral as secondary sources. In addition, primary sources can almost never be used to demonstrate that the article subject is notable enough for a Wikipedia article. --Chris (talk) 19:13, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

These are manuals that describes a programming language and a product that belong to a company. It is exactly as in LabView, similar product. I could not find any other third party manuals. There are several other link in the article. What do you suggest? {{helpme}}

You don't need to put a helpme tag after each question when you are in a conversation with someone. Doing so alerts other editors to that you are seeking help, but you didn't post a request anyone can help you with. If you do still need assistance, please start a new topic with a new helpme tag and a concise summary of what you need assistance with. I've read through this, and Peridon and Crazycomputers have both made it very clear what's wrong with the article. It lacks secondary sources. This mean someone other than the company producing the software publishing something about it, such as a review in a software magazine. If independent reliable sources never talk about this project yet, it is not notable, and it will be a waste of time to continue to keep trying to get a Wikipedia article about it accepted. It's too soon; the product hasn't made a name for itself yet. It's like a garage band or a game that you and your friends made up. "Not famous", as it were. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ  Contrib. 13:28, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

{WikiRonnie}I disagree. There are several links in the article (article is in my my user page) to magazines (see [1] and the product got several awards from magazines (Best In Test and was even a candidate to Best in Time award from Test & Measurement World magazine (see [2]). I tried to place just facts in the article and avoid commercial promotion. If what I wrote is incorrect and we place the article I'm sure other people that are in the industry would respond and provide their feedback..(is it not what Wikipedia is all about). In the ATEasy page I placed several external links, are these links to external magazines not good enough? Is IEEE not good external link??? searching in Google there are 25K results for ATEasy (not sure they all relevant, but don't think there is another thing called ATEasy)...

Speedy deletion nomination of Marvin Test Solutions

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marvin Test Solutions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. shoy (reactions) 19:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Geotest

The article Geotest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. shoy (reactions) 19:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Geotest for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geotest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geotest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. shoy (reactions) 20:47, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ATEasy (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ATEasy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 18:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:ATEasy

Hello, WikiRonnie. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "ATEasy".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CatcherStorm ^talk 15:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)