Ha! Did you really suggest that *I* try to build articles and not delete other editors work, when in fact I was the one repeatedly the victim of an edit war with two biased editors who deleted everything I tried to write and replace it with non-NPOV biased advert? GornDD (talk) 00:06, 8 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kid Cannabis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Coeur D'Alene and American
Jonathan Daniel Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Project X
Solar Roadways (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Viral

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, from a DR/N volunteer

edit
 

This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current Dispute Resolution Noticeboard case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties, please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Resolved". If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input. KeithbobTalk 12:47, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 15 June

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disruption

edit

In my view, starting an aggressive thread in which you purport to tally !votes without starting a poll, and labeling editors "deletionists" is fraught with conduct problems. How about proposing to close that thread and keep comments at DRN?

Meanwhile, I'm ok with starting a formal WP:POLL; I do that on a regular basis. But the goal is not majority rule. The goal is to focus the discussion. DRN is one way to do that, Polling another. I suppose a poll could happen at DRN.... why not ask the volunteer for advice? See Wikipedia:Polling is not a substitute for discussion

But the main point is your combative attitude and multiplication of threads (see WP:MULTI) is hurting, not helping. Suggest you take steps to back up, get the civil discussion back on track. If you can't disagree while getting along, you may have a rocky future here. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 16:24, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

"proposing to close that thread and keep comments at DRN?"
ok
sounds good. go ahead. Wholesomegood (talk) 16:38, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Your mess, you clean it up. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 16:39, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

RfC: Solar Roadways

edit

I am notifying everyone who participated in the Solar Roadways DRN that there is an open RfC at Talk:Solar_Roadways#RfC:_Should_the_cost_to_cover_the_entire_USA_be_included.3F. Thanks. -- GreenC 20:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Edit war and personal attacks

edit

Please do not repost stuff about costs that we are talking about until you have reached consensus. If you edit war, I'll report it. Likewise, if you make further anti-assume good faith remarks about editors I'll seek a block for that too.

WP:Focus on content

WP:Focus on content

WP:Focus on content

NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 05:42, 18 June 2014 (UTC)Reply