December 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Treehouse TV ‎ . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Stop linking to Wikia. Replacing a perfectly valid official site with a wikia link is not an appropriate edit. You were already warned for adding a Wikia link to NoCopyrightSounds. I undid your restore of that edit too. See WP:ELNO Meters (talk) 04:17, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

It not vanadlism Okay? I not use my sandbox. I will fix the website link later and you clear undo my edits White44Tree (talk) 04:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Read the link I already provided to you. A Wikia link to a fansite is not an appropriate external link, and removing the official website is indeed a proble. Don't restore those Wikia links. Meters (talk) 04:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
I've removed your wikia link to The Polar Express (film) too. That link doesn't even exist, and if it did it would fall under WP:ELNO also. Meters (talk) 04:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

White44Tree, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi White44Tree! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
edit

Please read WP:ELNO, and of course the rest of that guideline. We shouldn't add links to open wikis, e.g. Wikia. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 08:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikia is founder by the same person who created wikipedia. White44Tree (talk) 22:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
True but Wikipedia and Wikia serve different purposes and have different standards for what is contained. Sometimes, but seldomly, Wikias are OK but per WP:ELNO #12 we can't use "Open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors." A somewhat hard hurdle for inclusion here. Geraldo Perez (talk) 01:34, 26 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

I know that okay. White44Tree (talk) 02:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Regarding this: Wikipedia is not here to promote anything. Any further attempts to insert the link discussed in that Teahouse section will be regarded as spamming, and you can consider this your final warning on that subject. Useful contributions to Wikipedia are welcomed and encouraged. Spamming another site is not. Thanks. John from Idegon (talk) 21:54, 26 December 2016 (UTC)Reply