Welcome! edit

Hello Western John, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Quadzilla99 (talk) 18:24, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

October 2010

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Extinction (Star Trek: Enterprise). An episode of television is not a film. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:52, 25 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Swing Your Lady edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Swing Your Lady, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.filmaffinity.com/en/film581226.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:23, 8 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

November 2010 edit

  Your addition to Swing Your Lady has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:17, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have also removed the plot from The Black Viper. You can not copy plot summaries from anywhere else unless they are freely licensed. They should be written by you from scratch. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Clockwork Orange edit

I've undone your move, since the book is pretty clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for the title, there was no discussion beforehand, and most of the incoming links still pointed at the original title. If you disagree, please start a WP:Requested moves discussion on the talkpage so that we can determine consensus. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:22, 13 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

New categories edit

Hi there. You are creating and awful lot of categories of the type "Depictions of...", awfully fast. Several of them have ungrammatical and/or wrongly capitalized names. You are also miscategorizing some articles. I have proposed several of these categories for renaming at Categories for discussion. But in the meantime, you might want to slow down. Voceditenore (talk) 07:02, 20 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Similarly, I noticed you created the category Category:Television episodes Jackie Cooper. I think this would be better named Category:Television episodes by Jackie Cooper, in keeping with the rest of Category:Television episodes by American directors. If you agree, you can fix the relevant articles and we can avoid the rigamarole of Categories for discussion. Thanks! —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 04:27, 28 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Television episodes by Tom Hanks edit

 

Category:Television episodes by Tom Hanks, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 16:17, 29 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Actors who have played Superman/Superboy edit

 

Category:Actors who have played Superman/Superboy, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thanks. Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Film Invitation edit

 
Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Film? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. We also have a number of regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Erik (talk | contribs) 13:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Paul Lynch (Director) category edit

Could you place the tag {{db-author}} onto Category:Television episodes by Paul Lynch (Director) since you replaced it with Category:Television episodes by Paul Lynch (director)? That will it will get speedily deleted without having to wait four days for being an empty category. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 18:10, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

By the way, I believe you have improperly named the categories you created for individual televison directors. It should be Category:Television episodes directed by <<director's name>>, not Category:Television episodes by <<director's name>>, which follows along the lines of Category:Films directed by Steven Spielberg, as an example. Because you created so many of these, maybe someone could help you fix that. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 22:40, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

New categories edit

Please stop creating new categories using incorrect naming conventions. Instead of Category:Television episodes by John Tiffin Patterson, please name them Category:Television episodes directed by John Tiffin Patterson. All the others you have created are going to have to go to a category rename discussion because of this. So, please do it correctly from now on. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 16:05, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Also, if you put in a DEFAULTSORT in the category, you then do not need to sort the category. For example, you added {{DEFAULTSORT:Patterson, John Tiffin}} in the above category, but also added the same sort to the parent category in [[Category:Television episodes by American director|Patterson, John Tiffin]]. You use default sort so you don't have to individually sort categories, but you are doing both. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 16:23, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

All the television episodes by director categories have been nominated for renaming at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 March 11#Television episodes by director. You are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 10:56, 11 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Depictions of Genghis Khan on song edit

Category:Depictions of Genghis Khan on song, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 07:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Daredevil Mountaineer for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Daredevil Mountaineer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Daredevil Mountaineer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — ZjarriRrethues — talk 17:50, 3 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of David Copperfield (1956-1966 TV serial) edit

 

The article David Copperfield (1956-1966 TV serial) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article that conflates 2 entirely separate television serials

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tassedethe (talk) 18:49, 21 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Films directed by Seth MacFarlane edit

Category:Films directed by Seth MacFarlane, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:41, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Daredevil Mountaineer edit

 

The article The Daredevil Mountaineer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail WP:GNG and cites no reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Inks.LWC (talk) 00:59, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Daredevil Mountaineer edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Daredevil Mountaineer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 01:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Works inspired by Arthur C. Clarke edit

Category:Works inspired by Arthur C. Clarke, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 14:53, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Superman Radio edit

Category:Superman Radio, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jenks24 (talk) 06:01, 4 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. When you recently edited Deceived Slumming Party, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Dillon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:22, 18 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification edit

Hi. When you recently edited The Bandit's Waterloo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kidnapped (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for September 13 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lee Goldberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Last Word (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

September 2012 edit

Please read WP:OVERLINK before making any further edits to the article Mr. Young. Thanks, --Danmuz (talk) 16:44, 30 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1922 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Two-tone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 1 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Non-free content policy and guideline edit

Please do not continue placing non-free images to any pages except for actual articles, as you have done on your userpage. Such use is a clear violation of point number 9 of our policy concerning the use of non-free images. Continuing to do so can be viewed as disruptive behaviour and you may be blocked from editing. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:Films directed by Lillian Gish edit

Category:Films directed by Lillian Gish, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:13, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Films directed by Angelina Jolie edit

Category:Films directed by Angelina Jolie, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dusty|💬|You can help! 19:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Mack Sennett edit

Category:Mack Sennett, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 01:55, 19 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Films directed by Marlon Brando edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Films directed by Marlon Brando requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 72.244.200.47 (talk) 08:45, 16 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

See Category_talk:Films directed by Marlon Brando Thanks. 72.244.200.47 (talk) 08:46, 16 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Films by LGBT directors edit

Category:Films by LGBT directors, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 14:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Films directed by Silambarasan Rajendar has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Films directed by Silambarasan Rajendar, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:57, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Books by Bruce Campbell edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Books by Bruce Campbell requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rêve au coin du feu edit

 

The article Rêve au coin du feu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing was found in a BEFORE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:51, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Un rêve au coin du feu for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Un rêve au coin du feu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Un rêve au coin du feu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 22:38, 13 October 2022 (UTC)Reply