User talk:Wertuose/Archive 2009
Welcome!
editHello, Wertuose, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
August 2009
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Khachkar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Serouj (talk) 17:40, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- But I think that your revert is a vandalism, because you reverted all my edits without discussion. How can you prove that my edits are vandalism? Show me extracts from the rules, where written that, I could not put interwikis, or make wikification. I think that you don't know rules, but want to teach others to conform to them. Wertuose (talk) 18:19, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- First of all, khackars are not Albanian. There is not a single khachkar that is written in the Albanian language. Even the khachkar images shown in the Azeri wiki all have Armenian writings on them. Therefore, to repeatedly and deliberately reinsert a false claim into an article is considered vandalism. Serouj (talk) 19:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- Then you must revert only those edit, which does not correspond to rules, but not all of them. Wertuose (talk) 04:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Almost all of your edits to that article were inserting false claims into the article. On your last edit you fact-tagged a word (the word "destruction") that was linked to an article full of citations and references - but as Serouj explained, there was "no citation needed for statement - there is whole article on it". The only edits you made that could be argued to be legitimate were the removal of the word "Artsakh". However, just because those edits were legitimate does not mean they were factually correct or should not be reverted. If you really think the name "Artsakh" should be changed to something else you will need to argue for it in the talk page. Meowy 15:25, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- Then you must revert only those edit, which does not correspond to rules, but not all of them. Wertuose (talk) 04:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
- First of all, khackars are not Albanian. There is not a single khachkar that is written in the Albanian language. Even the khachkar images shown in the Azeri wiki all have Armenian writings on them. Therefore, to repeatedly and deliberately reinsert a false claim into an article is considered vandalism. Serouj (talk) 19:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Reverts
editWhat are you engaging in now on the Khachkar article can be aptly described as clear "vandalism." No serious scholar outside of Azerbaijan has accepted the frivolous theories posited by Bunyadov and his unscrupulous lackeys. Whether you choose to believe it or not is inconsequential but let this message serve as a reminder that by engaging in revert wars (e.g., as in the khachkar article) related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Turkey, you are subject to the general restrictions of the arbitration case as specified here Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. You can be blocked for reverting any article a total of three times in a 24H period, but should you revert an article related to Armenia or Azerbaijan more than once in a week, the same restrictions will apply. You've already violated 3RR. This is your final warning.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 22:03, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
- But you can't prove that this objects identifying as Albanian in Azerbaijan. And your blah blah cannot change this fact. So I think you are not right. Interwiki to Azerbaijani wikipedia shows actual position of this subject and point of view of Azerbaijan. As I said neither you nor any other armenian activist can change it. So stop bullshiting me. Wertuose (talk) 19:09, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
I reverted your uncivil edits to Monte Melkonian. Please refrain from such unsourced and NPOV attacks on historical figures.-- Patrick {oѺ∞} 20:17, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
- You claim, that ASALA is not a terrorist organization? :) Wertuose (talk) 04:46, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
- There's a way to say that without using phrases at are clearly opinionated like "widely known for". Weasel words like that will get reverted whether or not you're adding denunciations.-- Patrick {oѺ∞} 06:17, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Başka dilde makale yaratmak çok zor
editWertuose merhaba.Ben Bahadur.Azerbaycan Wikipedyasından Sortilegus tarafından biliyorsun uzaklaştırıldım.Bence Sortilegus haklı.Uzun süredir uğraşıyorum ve bilmediğim bir dilde makale yazmaya çalışıyorum.(Verdiğin programıda açamadım.World eklenti dosyası olan).Bu sebeplerle bencede yazmasam iyi olacaktı.Hiç bir şekilde kimseye bir kırgınlığım yok.Sizlerin zaten en iyi şekilde makaleler yaratıcağınıza inanıyorum.Sortilegus iletirmisin eğer içinde bir damla bile pişmanlık varsa olmasın.Benim içinde iyi olan buydu.Yaptığım makaleleride geliştirirseniz sevinirim.--85.100.42.44 (talk) 16:48, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
Alban xaç daşları
edit- http://az.trend.az/print/1058855.html
- http://213.172.74.36/print.php?lang=az&article_id=20060316025119091&page=00
- http://www.aztv.az/xbdx/x-1.asp?id=10425&il=2006
--85.100.42.44 (talk) 08:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Borjgali
editBorjgali - an ancient Georgian symbol of the Sun and is related to the Messopotamian and Sumerian symbols of the eternity and the Sun.
Sağdaki mezar taşının altında bu sembol var.Bu sembol sanırım albanlardada var.Bir araştırırmısın? (This be carried and there is grave symbol on the right in under. I would consider this symbol and there is Albanian. Investigate) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.100.42.44 (talk) 22:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Invitation
editI noticed your impassioned argument at Global Network for the Forecasting of Earthquakes you maybe interested in our group, which helps to rescue articles by adding sources.
|