To whom it may concern. I'm no psychologist, but I have added the reference to Stockholm Syndrome back again into the Star Trek TNG episode Suddenly Human because I want to argue it is a key feature of the episode. Considering the past history of the Talarians and the federation, Bev Crusher suggests Jojo may have been kidnapped (conceivably as a strategic tactic) and developed Stockholm Syndrome to explain his devotion to the Talarians despite signs of physical abuse over the duration of his captivity. This drives much of the plot (especially the actions and recommendations of Bev Crusher and Troi), and since Stockholm Syndrome can be said to psychologically resemble the dependent bond of infant to parent (per wikipaedia), the episode fails to consider an alternative that the child may have actually been rescued and adopted and that there is an 'actual familial' bond between jojo and his adopted Talarian father until at the very end when Picard is actually forced to listen to the boy (i.e get 'actual emperical evidence') and take him seriously to resolve which bonding hypothesis is true or at least most practically likely or best for the boy. Also I guess it's possible that Lima Syndrome occured, or Stockholm and Lima followed by a 'genuine' familial bond (The xenophobia of the Talarians (wearing gloves against contamination by aliens) was also a factor in that it could undermine empathy leading to adoption initially). Perhaps Stockholm and Lima can occur together if both captor and hostage are victims of a dystopia (and that could be used as a sign of a dystopia lol). The short of it is when i saw this episode recently i went straight to wikipaedia as soon as Stockholm was mentioned and found that very useful and relavent at the back of my mind as i watched the rest of the episode (but hope that was not just a bias). But even at the end of the episode, there still was some ambiguity about the nature of the boy's relationship with the Talarian: the trauma of the attack on Picard and the prospect of a reopening of a past conflict was used as a device to prompt a quick decision I guess. Werebus (talk) 18:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)