Nomination of Daniel Niazi (Founder) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Niazi (Founder) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Niazi (Founder) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Knud Winckelmann (talk) 13:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Niazi (Founder)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Daniel Niazi (Founder) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G4 - and salt - repeated re-creations, see log, Articles for deletion/Daniel Niazi, and current AfD

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GermanJoe (talk) 14:17, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2015

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Daniel Niazi (Founder) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Daniel Niazi (Founder) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/DanielNiazi) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:24, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Remove because is better sources, omg! - Its standing that we are going to put links and other sources to help wikipedia and you just remove? What's the point with sources? - We have all sources from media and report. Have other guys here on Wikipedia? Not the report, just few links that telling more that you know. Can you russian? This is ridiculous.

I am finish with Wikipedia - They can't follow the sources. So what is sources for Wikipedia? I have already proove Wikipedia.

From Walmart Jeni, Lomonosov Moscow State University (2009) University of Oslo (2013) --Wemself (talk) 16:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wemself, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
The
Adventure
 

Hi Wemself!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2015 (UTC)Reply