We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

WeThePeoples, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi WeThePeoples! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 13 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WeThePeoples (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Can someone bring User:Alison over here for heaven's sake and tell her this is one and only account I've been using for a long time now, am using, and will use? Thank you very much. WeThePeoples (talk) 14:06, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

this account has existed for only 18 days, which is not "a long time". I will notify Alison to obtain her comment. See edit below. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The blocking user is generally discouraged from reviewing his or her own block. Also, Alison is a checkuser. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:32, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'm happy to let any other admin review / unblock accordingly. However, you've created a string of different accounts now - one, Justtonotify (talk · contribs), only today - and you're constantly logging out and in to make controversial edits. Both of these matters are not okay. And you have one other account that's not blocked as of now. That's your original one, Scientiom (talk · contribs). You can't keep just doing that - Alison 08:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I wanted to leave you a message to tell you I want a different username since you didn't have email enabled. Besides, aren't we allowed to move onto another account if we stop using a old account? I've even read that people can have more than one account if they are not used for things like vote-stacking and only for alternative use? Thanks. --WeThePeoples (talk) 12:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
Indeed, but that's not what's happening here. You're flitting from account to account to account, as well as logging out to make tricky edits, then logging in again. That's not allowed per policy and it really looks like you're trying to evade scrutiny here. Every time you get into hot water, you move on to another account. You really need to stick to one and one only but you've burned through quite a few - Alison 06:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Huh, I still contend that I've been wronged considering that I'm only moving accounts and not using them for deceptive manipulative purposes such as votestacking or vandalism or anything like that, but whatever since I've found the old account details. --WeThePeoples (talk) 15:29, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply