Wbecker9
John McCain environmental record edit
Your contributions in this area are wanted, but they belong in Political positions of John McCain#Environmental issues, not where you put them. I've moved your material there, but you should integrate what you wrote with what was already there. Thanks. Wasted Time R (talk) 14:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ditto what Wasted Time R said, just about your edit to Barack Obama. I've moved your material to Political positions of Barack Obama#Environment. Please go to the political positions article and integrate what you wrote with what is already there. Thanks! --Bobblehead (rants) 18:16, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- I think you left a message on my user talk page when it should be intended for someone else. OhanaUnitedTalk page 23:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Hypothetic-Realist. You have no new work in your sandbox. You are to have two environmental sections written, with sources. These paragraphs should fulfill the criteria listed on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Environmental Record Task Force, under the "How to write an Environmental Records section." We must workshop our paragraphs in class. Mcwabaunsee (talk)
Please Investigate Problems on BP (British Petroleum) Wikipedia Page: Intentionally Burying Section on Gulf of Mexico Oil Disaster, Changing Name of Oil Disaster to Hide it edit
Any attempts to correct this (following reasonable Wikipedia guidelines) are met with aggressive reverts and edits. Intentional spinning and manipulation of article in favor of BP? Can this task force investigate this?
Currently there is no easily recognizable section on the current Gulf of Mexico Oil Disaster, surprisingly since the US Government has held BP responsible. Instead the "Oil Disaster" Section in the article keeps being given obscure (hard to recognize) names (as if someone is trying to hide the section from the public).
That section also keeps getting pushed to the bottom of the article (attempts to bury it)?
It's as if the BP Public Relations department has staff people who are aggressively spinning the article. Could you take a look? Do you know anyone else who could take a look at this? Thanks!
75.166.179.110 (talk) 18:29, 17 May 2010 (UTC)