WatteryFire

Welcome!

Hi WatteryFire! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Ekdalian (talk) 18:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kulin Kayastha, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 18:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)

Sorry for the inconvenience. WatteryFire (talk) 08:56, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pratapaditya. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Making the text say the opposite of the sources is very disruptive. You may be blocked if this continues. Bishonen | tålk 14:31, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

Adding to this, please do not cite sources that do not actually support the content, as you did here. utcursch | talk 22:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

South Asian social groups

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ratnahastin (talk) 12:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Ratnahastin (talk) 12:48, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Alright,I will just add ref in personal life and mention it the authentic sources. WatteryFire (talk) 03:54, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Regarding wikilinks

I noticed that you are providing the entire url instead of using simple wikilinks. If you want to link an article, say Brahmin, use double third bracket (opening) followed by the article name and close the same using double third bracket (closing). I am sharing an example as mentioned above. Brahmin, check the wikilink. Ekdalian (talk) 07:49, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Hey non-sense why you spread hate against TILI'S??

GIVE ME SIMPLE PROOF WHERE TILI AS A SC/OBC FROM OFFICIAL WEBSITE.TILI is categorised as a general caste,why you spread hate without knowing anything about Tili caste?? PHANTOM 097y (talk) 01:14, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Check Bihar government sc classification WatteryFire (talk) 10:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

i already checked this

In Bihar TILI'S are considered as general caste I checked this from NCBC PHANTOM 097y (talk) 00:18, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

I think you are jealous from Tili caste I think that's why you spread fake info regarding this caste PHANTOM 097y (talk) 00:19, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

First off,Learn English Properly. Secondly

https://biharhelp.in/bihar-categories-wise-caste-list-2023/

Tilis fall in extremely backward classes in Bihar,who are practically Broader Sanskritized SC and get same reservation as much as SC people WatteryFire (talk) 11:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

your provided URL is not reliable source

Go and check NCBC

Don't believe in fake/local website PHANTOM 097y (talk) 13:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

In most states Tili Is known as Sub caste of Tilis,and evryone knows that Tilis failed Sanskritization on basis Of social status WatteryFire (talk) 11:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

I mean Tilis @PHANTOM 097y WatteryFire (talk) 11:45, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

I mean Tilis are subcaste of Telis WatteryFire (talk) 11:45, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Nope TILI aren't a subcaste of TELI or kolu at all most of the HISTORIANS CONFUSED Tili with TELI but it is completely debunked by Bengal accountancy 1876 PHANTOM 097y (talk) 13:41, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Historians are confused accordingly to you! So, we will accept your original research; please read our no original research policy, WP:OR. Ekdalian (talk) 18:12, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Ok if I can't use research policy then you peoples spread fake info that Teli and Tili is same? PHANTOM 097y (talk) 00:33, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Man this is a mess,Have a civil discussion and Give any reliable source. Also I referenced a journal. WatteryFire (talk) 05:28, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

I refreed calcutta university journal who considerd Tili as a High caste and seperate from Teli now you PEOPLES stop include us with your Teli group.

We both are different we are general caste and you peoples are OBC/SC now you stop frekin about this matter? PHANTOM 097y (talk) 16:09, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Don't cite Raj era source; you have been told repeatedly! Ekdalian (talk) 18:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Ok I provide you after British raj era PHANTOM 097y (talk) 00:34, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

PHANTOM 097y, WatteryFire, Ekdalian Talk pages are a place to debate disagreements, with hope of reaching consensus. Please to not accuse other editors of spreading hate, being jealous, fake info, etc. David notMD (talk) 01:27, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Ok sir 👍 PHANTOM 097y (talk) 16:10, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WatteryFire. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Mz7 (talk) 18:28, 29 June 2024 (UTC)