Welcome!

Hello, WarrenTrenton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just H 00:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Little context in Bringing it fall all circle

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bringing it fall all circle, by BassoProfundo (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bringing it fall all circle is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bringing it fall all circle, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Bringing it fall all circle itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:33, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

If you intend to contest the speedy deletion of Bringing it fall all circle, please leave a note on the article's talk page explaining why you do not think it should be deleted. Thank you. BassoProfundo 22:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Animal Rangers

edit
 

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Animal Rangers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. – ornis 08:41, 22 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sky High version 2.0

edit

A tag has been placed on Sky High version 2.0, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Sky High version 2.0. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Cap'n Walker 16:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: Braids of the Powhatan

edit

  If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. gnfnrf (talk) 19:39, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Braids of the Powhatan

edit
 

I have nominated Braids of the Powhatan, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Braids of the Powhatan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ukexpat (talk) 20:12, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

September 2008

edit

  The recent edit you made to Braids of the Powhatan constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. VasilievV 2 19:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply


  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Braids of the Powhatan. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  – iridescent 22:41, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008

edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Pocahontas (1995 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 23:46, 15 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page 82nd Academy Awards has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 05:47, 8 March 2010 (UTC)Reply