Waren Beat

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Marcelo Samuel Berman. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Dear David Eppstein,

I have already commented on the issue, and, more than that, I have explained that the war on the article is actually a dispute between Albert Berman and Marcelo Berman, who are son and father. Wikipedia actions cannot be based on strictly personal family issues. This is a conflict that both of them have to settle outside the Wiki domain.

The deletion request is absurd and must be removed. There is no sense in debating a problem that must be confined within the limits of the Berman family.

The dispute on deletion is one issue. Inappropriate behavior, false accusations is another that by itself should be brought to the attention of admins. The original article had claims to "winning Nobel prizes" and was marked for deletion several times. Very few of the original concerns, from when the article was twice deleted were addressed and instead the editor created new profiles and rewrote the article. The necessity for editing is quite obvious and it is inappropriate that when they are discussed, that they should be met with personal attacks and threats. Now concerning deletion, it is up to Admins to decide if aggressive and inappropriate behavior should influence on the decision of keeping the article.Albertlberman (talk) 06:23, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MarceloBerman. Thank you. noq (talk) 11:40, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 13:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Others have already deleted legitimate talk page comments and made them impossible to access and restore. So, the disruptive behavior is theirs, if you are not one of them.

Please, stop accusing me of false things, rather than studying the issues.--Waren Beat (talk) 02:06, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Marcelo Samuel Berman orphan tag

You removed the orphan tag on the Marcelo Samuel Berman article saying that it wasn't an orphan, a wikipedia article is called an orphan when no other wikipedia article links to it. If you look in the toolbox on the left you will see a link called "what links here" which shows this [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Marcelo_Samuel_Berman Theroadislong (talk) 16:29, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Waren Beat. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Marcelo Samuel Berman, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

Question: why do you suspect it in the first place? It is clear that I am not affiliated with the people in the article, and there are no reasons to think that. On the other hand, the persons who vandalize this article seem to be affiliated with the subject Marcelo Berman, since one of them is Albert Berman, a relative of Berman's. --Waren Beat (talk) 03:59, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. It appears that you have a direct relationship with this subject. Please reveal what this relationship is. Especially since your account has been created and used only for the purpose of promoting and defending this subject. Aldebaran66 (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Olavo de Carvalho, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. If you delete material please include a comment as why it was removed. Aldebaran66 (talk) 22:18, 7 March 2013 (UTC)