Walter Spraggins

Welcome!

Hello, Walter Spraggins, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ownermanager, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Cabayi (talk) 17:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ownermanager

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ownermanager requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 17:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of American Social Contract

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on American Social Contract, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 17:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with...I have posted a page and it has been marked for delition. Can you help me edit it so that this does not happen?

Walter Spraggins (talk) 19:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)wspraggins

You seem to mistake Wikipedia for a soapbox from which you can promote your political positions. I'm sorry, but we're an encyclopedia, and such promotion is not appropriate. Those are not encyclopedia articles; they should not be on Wikipedia. Huon (talk) 19:45, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ownermanager

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ownermanager requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McGeddon (talk) 13:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

You wrote on the talk page: "these are facts; nothing more, nothing less." Maybe, but you pulled them together to draw your own conclusion and invent a word. For the reasons why this is not appropriate in Wikipedia, see:

• WP:No original research, particularly the section Synthesis: "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources."
• WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary#Neologisms.

JohnCD (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 13:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Help me!

Please help me with...

Walter Spraggins (talk) 15:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)Hello JohnCD, Okay, the objection now is to the use of the compund word ownermanager? A neologism (/niːˈɒlədʒɪzəm/; from Greek νέο- néo-, "new" and λόγος lógos, "speech, utterance") is the name for a relatively new or isolated term, word, or phrase that may be in the process of entering common use, but that has not yet been fully accepted into mainstream language. For children what word would you suggest? Okay I understand that Wikipeda is not a dictionary. It is a new learning aid. Wikipeda was a neologism when it started. It is okay for you to invent a new way of saying "public-handmade-cobled together-encyclopedia", but it is not okay for anyone else?

If you want to speak to JohnCD directly, it's probably best to draw his attention to this page by using the {{ping}} template, or posting on his talk page. I understand that Wikipedia's policies can be frustrating to new users, but our policy page covering neologisms exists to ensure that topics covered on Wikipedia have received enough substantial, reliable coverage in third-party sources about them so as to make the page encyclopedic. Neologisms aren't included when sources have only used the phrase; they can be included when reliable sources have written about the term (at which point they would no longer be a "neologism"). Cheers, Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 16:37, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

It's all right, I was watching this page. Mr Spraggins, you have taken from the Constitution of the US the idea that a citizen is an owner of the US, and from the "Constitution of the American Social Contract" the idea that the government are employees of the citizens, and put those together to support your invented word "OwnerManager" for the staus of the citizen. No such idea is stated in either of your sources, so what you are doing is synthesis.

The fundamental issue here is that it is not the role of an encyclopedia to publish new ideas, any more than new words; only to summarise what has already been published in reliable sources. The policy Wikipedia:No original research is absolutely fundamental. I recommend that you read the whole of it, but note in particular the statement:

"If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery."

See also WP:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. I am quoting these policies not to baffle you with small print, but to explain why Wikipedia is not for what you want to do. You may find some ideas at Wikipedia:Alternative outlets for places where you could publish your thesis about OwnerManagers. JohnCD (talk) 19:15, 29 September 2016 (UTC)