Welcome!

edit

Hello, WalterBaker4242, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:29, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


Baseball, MLB

edit

Hi! I saw that you chose to edit two articles of high quality status. One is of Good Article status, which means it's among the best articles on Wikipedia. These articles are seen as generally comprehensive. The other is of Featured Article status, which means that it's the best of the best and is seen as about as relatively complete as an article can get, barring new events, research, or revelations. What this means is that it will be more difficult for you to find something to add, correct, or expand on, particularly with the baseball article (as it's a Featured Article) than it would be for a lower quality article. High quality status articles are also more likely to be more heavily watched or edited, so there is a higher chance for pushback on any new edits.

This doesn't mean that you can't edit either page, but I would recommend reading over the article's talk page and posting about any potential edits prior to making them live, in order to gain consensus. You may also want to find an article of lower quality to work on, as this would be easier to expand and would likely have less pushback. With articles of high quality, pushback and having your material reverted is definitely extremely likely to happen.

Reviewing your work, it looks like the draft is written as a reflective essay rather than an encyclopedia article. It uses "you" and asks questions directly of the reader rather than using the neutral third person that Wikipedia utilizes. Also, the source you have in the article is a wiki, meaning that it's a source that anyone can edit. As such it wouldn't be seen as reliable on Wikipedia. A person could sign in and add, intentionally or not, incorrect information. If you're interested in editing baseball related articles I would recommend editing one of the articles here, as they're all articles that could use more expansion and would be far easier to edit. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:38, 8 May 2020 (UTC)Reply