Waldoalvarez00
Proposed deletion of Convex Software Library edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Convex Software Library, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- unreferenced article with no indication of notability
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RadioFan (talk) 02:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Deletion of images at Circumcision edit
You've been around here long enough to know that you shouldn't simply delete relevant material from an article with no explanation. I've reverted your deletion again; if you feel this deletion is warranted, please start a discussion on the Talk:Circumcision page and gain consensus for your proposed changes. Exploding Boy (talk) 19:38, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
For your information edit
[1]. Exploding Boy (talk) 04:55, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
I was made aware of your edits at the above link. Please note that edits such as this are inappropriate; you make several personal attacks which are against policy, most notably. The removal of the images in question is also against site guidelines; Wikipedia is not censored. Please don't make personal attacks against other editors in future; I suspect that any future attacks such as these will get you blocked sooner than later. Regarding the pictures, a discussion has been started on the article talk page, where you can weigh in with policy-based comments. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:20, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Efficient Mail Submission and Delivery for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Efficient Mail Submission and Delivery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Efficient Mail Submission and Delivery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 10:13, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Convex Software Library edit
The article Convex Software Library has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references, tagged for refs since 2009
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 17:04, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
The article Form Faces has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:18, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FormFaces is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FormFaces until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)