User talk:Waacstats/archive10

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Epiphyllumlover in topic Wayman Mitchell AfD


Nomination of Billy Koh for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Billy Koh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billy Koh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Template:BaltimoreCityMD-NRHP-stub has been nominated for discussion edit

 

Category:Template:BaltimoreCityMD-NRHP-stub, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:40, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Precious anniversary edit

Precious
 
Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Six years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:38, 14 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Steve Millar for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Millar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Millar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Allreet (talk) 23:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  Grand Tutnum
Congratulations on reaching this milestone.  M A A Z   T A L K  18:24, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Margit Sebők for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Margit Sebők is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margit Sebők until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 18:04, 13 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfD for Ulisses Soares edit

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulisses Soares--Hodgdon's secret garden (talk) 21:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mahmoud Ramadan Elattar edit

 

The article Mahmoud Ramadan Elattar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sincerely, Redactyll (talk) 04:50, 18 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Anobiidae-stub edit

 Template:Anobiidae-stub has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:16, 7 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Merger discussion for DeQueen Formation edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing—DeQueen Formation—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Paine Ellsworth, ed.  put'r there  14:16, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Reply


Rod Morrison edit

Hi, I think it was you who got the date of death for this old hockey player and I'm just wondering what your source for it was (and also why no city of death was included). Any info much appreciated.Researchguy (talk) 20:51, 24 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:English football midfielder, 1960s birth stubs edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:English football midfielder, 1960s birth stubs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wayman Mitchell AfD edit

Feel free to vote at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wayman_Mitchell.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 18:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)Reply