WRobertson

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Regional Distribution of Climate Change Impacts in Germany.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Regional Distribution of Climate Change Impacts in Germany.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ^{My name is}not^dave (talk/contribs) 18:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Lupita's Peer Review

The article overall is well structured and has both relevant and reliable information. My only suggestion is to add information to the 2016 and Mitigation sections. In my opinion, there is information regarding the Paris Climate agreement that could be added to both sections. Furthermore, adding more information regarding what has the German government done specifically in regards to climate change, for example specific policies, and if none have been enacted adding that note would also give more insight into the subject. Overall the article was coherent, well structured and fulfilled the educational role. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lupitaf (talk • contribs) 04:34, 26 November 2017 (UTC)