User talk:W33dscoper/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi W33dscoper! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 08:18, Tuesday, January 24, 2017 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Unblock Request
W33dscoper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am currently logged in as my usual account, but because I am on a blocked web host provider, I can't edit. Can you change it to only unregistered users? My regular account isn't blocked. IP = 107.151.128.0W33dscoper (talk) 05:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your request was considered at the WikiProject on open proxies, and the unblock request was declined. Yamla (talk) 13:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I have forwarded your request to Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests#107.151.128.0/18. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Message
Writing a message to you, it might take a while, please do not answer now, I don't know in advance if there will be anything to answer anyway, maybe, maybe not... Just something to think about probably... We'll see exactly how it will turn out... I think evth is written in advance... But evth is so chaotic... Difficult with today's technology to determine evth in advance... Maybe I have already written evth that was to be written, I mean the main message in this message. Anyway, let's see how things will shape... 86.129.117.3 (talk) 03:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Who or what is evth? W33dscoper (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hiya :) "evth" is just an abbreviation of "everything" :) 86.129.117.3 (talk) 17:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
One of my favorite color is grey but it is not really a color or is it?
Not sure
No free will
I need to brush my teeth now
Self-actualizing hard
Even when brushing my teeth
(Maybe) Maslow was wrong on being able to self-actualize only a small fraction of the time
Imho you can self-actualize 100% of the time, specially when you live in 4D (3D + time)
OK ttys... :)
:)
...
My browser or maybe brother is Pale Moon
Please don't hack me!
I am a good guy I think
Peaceful I think
Not sure of any thing
It's the problem with me or is it a problem?
Not sure of any thing
We'll see
How things turn
Lovely
Lovely browser
I love the name
I love the Moon
Always in the Moon
Since a very long time :)
464 tabs opened
Now 472
Getting a bit crazy
But holding it together
Pale (no Vitamin D under the grey sky :)
Blackpool is lovely
Seagull coming for me
It is hungry maybe
Could not prevent myself
Gave it a little sardine treat
Only something small
Coz it must not become dependent on me for its food
Maybe Maslow is right sometimes
But only sometimes
Now the seagull has flown away
On the Moon 86.129.117.3 (talk) 12:12, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
ULTRAFAST
No Rush
Reuse.
Repeat.
Let It Be
Request from 86.129.117.3 via cp3056 frontend, Varnish XID 499891387
Error: 503, Backend fetch failed at Wed, 03 Jun 2020 18:28:51 GMT
Your sun
Your Sun
Your son
Your Son
Let It Be
""Fake news" can spread like a virus" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.117.3 (talk) 02:33, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Fake "fake news" spread slower (FFNSS)
"Google in $5bn lawsuit for tracking in 'private' mode"
"Android: Why this photo is bricking some phones" (ethereal sky) (517 opened tab including Android, Cog NRG: ~27%)
"Coronavirus: France's virus-tracing app 'off to a good start'"
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.117.3 (talk) 03:48, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Brushed teeth but carried on self-actualizing like crazy
in N dimensions i.e. usual 4D + spiritual, intellectual, emotional, naturalistic, etc... dimensions
because I was admiring the spectacular grey sky at the same time
also treating seagull with a bit of tinned mackerel, etc...
My mind was "hyper-threading" in some ways...
But again I had some doubts:
What about seagull-human physical/social distancing to reduce risk of zoonotic spread of SARS-CoV-2?
This is something I've added to my grey area
What about the appropriate distance? 2m? 1.5m? 1m?
Maybe even 0.5m is sufficient when the weather is windy?
"Windy" would mean which minimum wind speed exactly?
This is something maybe MuZero (Draft:MuZero)
or one of its successors might be able to answer one day, may be...
Seagull is watching me while I am writing this, am wondering what it is thinking about...
Maybe one of MuZero's successors will be able to give me that answer too in the (near?) future...
Maybe one of MuZero's successors will even give me the chance to experience what it is like to be a seagull, who knows...
Status of talk page editors in relation to Wikipedia edition
- W33dscoper: I'm not really an active editor on Wikipedia. I mostly just read the pages on Wikipedia, and only edit if I see something off or missing. Plus, I've decided to stay away from editing the List of human disease case fatality rates page for now due to the dispute on the content that page should include. Thanks for understanding! W33dscoper (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- 86.129.117.3:
- {On Fire Love :); 3 PM, 3 June 2020 (UTC)}
- IN CONSOLIDATION MODE
- {Pale Moon: 1,325,696K Private Bytes after having watched BBC News ""Fake news" can spread like a virus"; 3 AM, 4 June [[2020] (UTC);}
- {Opened tabs: 515; 3 AM, 4 June 2020 (UTC);} — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.117.3 (talk)
- {Cog NRG: 50% and going down; 23:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC);}
- {Opened tabs: 511; 22:10, 3 June 2020 (UTC);}
- {Opened tabs: 498; 20:29, 3 June 2020 (UTC);}
- {On Fire Love :); 3 PM, 3 June 2020 (UTC)}
Comments
- The current owner of this page (after Wikipedia itself I believe) is User:W33dscoper
- User:W33dscoper benefits of course from all the privileges associated with owning this talk page
- This includes asking (any) people (maybe not Wikipedia admin, etc...) to stop flooding his talk page with any kind of stuff
- This includes deleting any part or absolutely evth on this page... Xe can even if xe wishes so (don't know if it is possible) to ask Wikipedia to erase evth in the database so evth that was stored here is destroyed. But obviously if any people/software saved the content of this page the saved content saved this way might be available somewhere and not much control on how the saved content is the use / reused by anybody / anything etc... etc... etc... You get the point, it's messy and chaotic... the information that ends up on this page...might end up anywhere...not much control about it I guess... that's the way it is....GENERALLY SPEAKING PLEASE BE KIND AND CONSIDERATE THANK YOU SPECIALLY FOR User:W33dscoper WHO IS EXTREMELY NICE TO LET ME (AND MAYBE OTHERS) "TRASH" HIS TALK PAGE ALTHOUGH I AM TRYING MY BEST TO PROVIDE THE VERY BEST CONTENT QUALITY BUT I AM LIMITED IN MY CURRENT CAPACITIES BEING COGNITIVE, EMOTIONAL AND ALL THE REST BUT I AM ALWAYS TRYING MY BEST PLEASE MAY I ASK YOU TO DO THE SAME SPECIALLY ON THIS PAGE MANY MANY MANY MANY THANKS AND ESPECIALLY TO User:W33dscoper (who can end this up when xe wants to HERE. I MUST SAY I LOVE IT VERY MUCH HERE. NO FREE WILL SO WAS MEANT TO BE HERE NOW SINCE THE BIG BANG AT LEAST IT IS MY "BELIEF" FROM ALL THE DATA I HAVE BEEN ABLE TO ACCESS AND PROCESS TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY WITH YOUR HELP OF COURSE THANK YOU AGAIN SORRY MESSY BUT THIS HAPPENS WHEN YOU HAVE TO IT IS FOR THE GOOD CAUSE WE ARE KIND HERE. THANK YOU. MAYBE TO BE IMPROVED SPECIALLY IN TERMS OF CAPITALIZATION ETC...LOL...FUN PLAYFUL A BIT ABSURD TRYING TO BE AS INTELLIGENT AS POSSIBLE ETC... NOT SURE OF ANYTHING
- THE ULTIMATE AIM IS TO IMPROVE WIKIPEDIA I BELIEVE BUT I HAVEN'T READ ALL THE SMALL LINES MY CURRENT BRAIN VERSION IS TOO WEAK FOR THAT SORRY GUYS IF YOU WANT MORE INFO ON THAT PLEASE READ THE SMALL LINES YOURSELF WHEREVER THEY ARE THANK YOU IN ANY CASE TRY TO BE KIND THANK YOU GUYS
- GENERALLY MY BRAIN IS CURRENTLY VERY SUB-OPTIMAL SO THE CONTENT GENERATED BY MY BRAIN MIGHT BE VERY SUB-OPTIMAL TOO BUT I AM TRYING MY BEST WITH WHAT I HAVE THANK YOU PLEASE DO THE SAME WW ARE ALL VERY WEAK I THINK IN TERMS OF COGNITIVE CAPACITY AND IT IS A CHALLENGE FOR US ALL, LET'S TRY OUR BEST THANK YOU! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.117.3 (talk) 22:19, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- The sky has been absolutely mind-blowing today in terms of greyness, I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THE SKY AND WITH ME TODAY BUT THE GREY IS GOING ABSOLUTELY CRAZY, now the moon is full or almost full and there is an absolutely crazy halo around it generated by the crazy moon clouds duo... from the Earth ground the moon clouds duo halo looks like a huge light circle in the sky... that circle of light is very luminous very white close to the moon and then progressing towards the edge of the circle in turns RED. The Moon looks on fire tonight like me, it is disturbing, it is one of these moments of self-transcendance I have experienced such moments many many times recently basically since around the start of 2020. The 2020's are going to be very special. This I have predicted for a while already since around 2009 but loads of other people have predicted special things happening in the 2020's so we are in (and already are with Covid-19 etc..) for a crazy crazy ride in the 2020's imho. It's one of the reason I am right here right now, I would not do that in normal times, THINGS ARE UNRAVELING IT SEEMS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.117.3 (talk) 22:32, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- SineBot is like a funny playful puppy, I like "him", edit conflicts sometimes etc... it's what happens with puppies you have to take care of them... !nosign! when required etc...etc...
- THE BOTS ARE ALREADY EVERYWHERE HOPEFULLY FOR THE GOOD, FINGERS CROSSED FOR FRIENDLY AI
- I told you it might be messy and it is messy and chaotic indeed but I will try to sort out the mess when I have a bit of time. Managing the chaos as best as possible is a big task basically trying to tame ENTROPY this is CHALLENGING — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.117.3 (talk) 22:49, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Omg was not even able to correct 1 typo and I introduced one... talking about weak cognitive capacities this is frightening...now 2 typos corrected hopefully.
- I never gave you permission to use my talk page for this purpose. You are free to leave me messages and discuss things on my talk page, but please refrain from using my talk page for posting personal updates. There's no need to delete anything, I'll archive them in 90 days. Thanks for understanding! W33dscoper (talk) 09:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
- Hiya, thanks a lot for everything, you are very permissive on your talk page and I love that thank you, I am trying to respect it as much as possible. The ultimate goal of course is to improve Wikipedia and as "subgoals" knowing more about each other, our thought processes, etc... is very useful, specially as you know I am interested in almost everything and in particular neurosciences, psychoneuroendocrinology, etc... Now I am mostly in consolidation mode meaning, I am going to clean up / organize things a bit more etc... so we can communicate as best as possible on your talk page... which is I am very aware the page you use for talking to other people...so of course I don't want to be too invasive etc... which would be counter-productive and so on.... So I am trying my best... If I do sth/say you don't want feel comfortable here of course, let me know, I don't have a big ego so basically you can say anything to me no pb at all :) Evth is up for discussion imho and nothing off-limit but please if I am doing things you don't want on your talk page you let me know of course.
- You say in your edit summary, "don't assume my gender", actually I have never assumed it and tbh I don't mind your gender or if you have on or not, etc... it's not something I care much about in a person tbh... So I think you said that because when I referred to you at the 3rd person I said "he" if I remember well. How would you like me to refer you at the 3rd person. Tbh if I had the choice between "they" and "it" I would prefer "it" as it is less confusing in terms of plural etc... but maybe we can create another word like "xe", so now we have he/she/xe/it ok and "xe" refers to a person who does not want to be identified as a he or a she, it that ok with you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.117.3 (talk) 22:09, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Notes
Section whose aim (functionally) is to act as some sort of "ST, MT, LT unlimited combined working memories" for users {editors, readers, , ...} of this present page in combination with the memories made available by every accessible universe including Wikipedia (formulation maybe to be improved)
- I believe there are 2 modes when you do stuff:
- An "attacking" mode (I need to find a better word maybe that sounds less "aggressive") mode where you create new things and it gets a bit messy etc...FB motto was sth like "Make and Break things" etc... you get the idea, the messy create mode.
- A "consolidation" mode where you try to clean up the mess basically trying to tame entropy. Basically some sort of negentropic phase or sth like that.
Thank U's
- Basically for me here it is thank you User:W33dscoper and thank you to evth in evy universe including Wikipedia of course :)))
Legalization of cannabis
Hi, was just visiting your page after your interesting edits in List of human disease case fatality rates and now just saw you are a proponent of the full legalization of cannabis (feel free to remove that whole line when you want of course).
I would really like us, if possible and if you would like to, to make a little thought experiment (which actually happens more and more frequently in the real world) together and talk about it between intelligent and reasonable people (which I think we both are).
Imagine there is someone who spends most of its days (and/or nights) smoking cannabis and it absolutely stinks (in the opinions of lots of other people smelling it) all the way inside other persons' home or other persons regular place of work/leisure.
How would you recommend people who are subjected to the very strong and very frequent smell of cannabis smoke and who do not like it at all (even worse it could be people who are asthmatics etc... but let's leave these more special cases aside for now) to deal with the cannabis smoker who won't stop/reduce its smoking even if xe is repeatedly asked to stop/reduce its smoking in the two cases where 1. the legislation does NOT allow consumption of cannabis and 2. the legislation DOES allow the consumption of cannabis.
Thanks a lot in advance for your hopefully helpful answer :)
Jo (this is a temporary pseudonym of mine because, on this topic, I don't feel like signing too prominently with my IP although it is trivially find-able of course, I could use a proxy etc... but that would be lots of complications... I hope the fact that my IP is trivially find-able won't have any negative ramifications... I also trust you and other people who read this as well to be reasonable with the use of my IP, thank you (generally I don't like registering on anything including Wikipedia so it's why I don't do that on Wikipedia and don't want to make any exceptions, thank you so much for your understanding :) ))
- Well, I do support the legalization of cannabis, but not the right to smoke cannabis wherever and whenever one wants, as people still need to be respectful of other people's preferences. Personally, I believe that people should be allowed to freely smoke cannabis at home, but there should be legal restrictions on cannabis use in public places. W33dscoper (talk) 01:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind answer :) OK so please could you kindly answer the exact same thought experiment simply with the added parameter that the smoker is smoking in its home, thank you:) Jo (May I ask you while you reply to remove my IP from your talk page content if/whenever a bot adds it many thanks :))
- I believe that a person should be allowed to smoke cannabis at home without any legal restrictions. If other people have a problem with this, they have the right to not go to the smoker's home. If they have an important meeting, they can arrange it elsewhere where the smoking of cannabis is banned so that everyone is comfortable. W33dscoper (talk) 01:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- But if the smoker smokes in its home AND as a result it strongly smells in other people's home (or work/leisure places) (because the smoker is in its garden and/or the windows are opened, etc... or it is a small building and the 2 homes are quite close to each other and even with no garden and all windows closed the smoke is so pervasive that it still smells, etc...)? Jo
- I believe that it is the smoker's responsibility to make sure that the smell doesn't make anyone uncomfortable. If making other people's homes smell is unavoidable, then they should check with their neighbors to make sure that they're OK with it, and if they're not, then they should go to another place where cannabis smoking is permitted (e.g. dispensaries) to smoke instead. W33dscoper (talk) 02:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- This is a kind and nice answer from you but it assumes the smoker is willing to be cooperative with its neighbors which in the though experiment it (the smoker) is not. Please answer the thought experiment exactly i.e. the smoker carries on smoking frequently in its home and is unwilling to cooperate with its neighbors about the problematic smell, thank you :) Jo
- If the smoker is unwilling to be cooperative with their neighbors then I believe that legal action is justified. Perhaps I should reword my previous statement to "a person should be allowed to smoke cannabis at home without any legal restrictions AS LONG AS THEY DON'T MAKE THE PEOPLE AROUND THEM PHYSICALLY UNCOMFORTABLE".Plus, a smoker that refuses to do so is likely addicted to cannabis, and should seek addiction therapy (although cannabis addiction is usually only observed among previously habitual users). W33dscoper (talk) 03:04, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- It's starting to become interesting but obviously a bit more intricate and technical :) It's late in my time zone, my energy levels are going down and hence I need to do other things much less cognitively demanding but I will carry on this interesting discussion with you on that topic at some point (hopefully at the latest in a few days), I am a glad I found someone like you i.e. intelligent both logically and inter-personally to debate that topic in an intelligent and friendly way :) Wishing you well and talk to you later. Also thank you for your contribution in List of human disease case fatality rates which I find very relevant and interesting :) TTYS beautiful mind and take care of your beautiful self whichever gender it is :) <3 (I am not in the US so it will be hard for you to sue me for sexual harassment ;-p Am joking of course but if you think I'm going to far with the familiarity/endearment let me know my love, here in Northern England we are (I think) usually pretty liberal with that :) ) Jo 03:30, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! Just remember to create a new section the next time since the indents here are getting quite ridiculous :) W33dscoper (talk) 03:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you love, I will let you deal the way you want with the indentation as you are more knowledgeable than me about Wikipedia/MediaWiki, TTYS, good night and sweet dreams (remember you need some good regular sleep if you want to live as long as possible, unfortunately I am quite bad on that and I blame you for it tonight but hopefully I will have sweet dreams about you and I don't need cannabis or any other drugs for that, your beautiful mind suffices for me ;p) ) Jo 03:50, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- Also sorry I am digressing a bit but while I am thinking about US-UK-drugs, if you come across Trump, kindly tell him that in the UK we are not big fans of US chlorinated chickens and livestock animals overloaded with antibiotics being included in a US-UK trade deal :p You guys in the US are nuts with drugs, even your president on hydroxychloroquine and finasteride (which is an antiandrogen, he surely wants to live as long as possible!) among others! Anyway good night love, take care of yourself and go easy on drugs ;p Jo 04:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- By the way, according to the user page of the bot that automatically signs people's comments, you can opt out of it by adding !nosign! to the edit summary for the comments you do not wish to have signed. Like this.
- Thank you so much love, I vaguely thought about reading SineBot user page but this very rapidly fell down my priority list so thank you for being nerdy enough to do it for me, OMG we are so complementary, but virtually only cause in reality I couldn't cope more than 2 minutes being physically close to a cannabis smoker ;p Jo 06:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
- May I ask you to leave the indentation as it is at least until we agree to do something about it, I like how crazy it is becoming, thank you so much love :) Jo 04:08, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- What is emphasized in green above which is the depth of the crux of the matter we have currently reached is typical grey area stuff. It clouds my mind making it foggy. Not sure how I want to conclude this discussion right now. Wondering and thinking about it. Will tell you in a few days, thank you for your patience love :)Jo 20:20, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Just a couple of preliminary thoughts: Emphasized PHYSICALLY UNCOMFORTABLE because this is the very heart of the matter. Physical discomfort would have to be defined first (speculative link to "distress tolerance") so that it can be "objectively" assessed in some ways... Something to think about... Let's carry on thinking critically... :)Jo 20:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Meaning of your username
Hi again :) Sorry to be a bit indiscreet, I am quite curious what your username means, why you have chosen it, etc... Would you tell me? :) If you want to keep all this a secret, obviously that's fine :) But I would really love it if you share the meaning of your username with me :) That would be quite a special and touching thing to do... 86.129.117.3 (talk) 03:43, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Don't mind the username, I made this account 3 years ago and I couldn't think of a better username. Now I kind of regret choosing this username, but I don't really feel like changing it either since the process is kind of a hassle and because I STILL couldn't think of a better username. Thanks for understanding! W33dscoper (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for giving me more details about it, I like it, it sounds kind of cyber-esoteric (or esotero-cybernetic). Does it have some sort of meaning(s) or does it make reference to certain thing(s)? If not, how did you generate it? 86.129.117.3 (talk) 17:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- It's pretty much the first thing that came to mind when I decided on a username, and I went with it since I can't think of anything better. W33dscoper (talk) 06:41, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Contribution timing
Hiya :) I have noticed that you haven't contributed a lot in the last few days :) Was wondering why that is? Sorry am so curious! If you want to keep that a secret that's fine of course but I'd love to know for sure if that is possible :) Up to you to tell me or not, of course :) Have a nice day/night love :) 86.129.117.3 (talk) 03:58, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not really an active editor on Wikipedia. I mostly just read the pages on Wikipedia, and only edit if I see something off or missing. Plus, I've decided to stay away from editing the List of human disease case fatality rates page for now due to the dispute on the content that page should include. Thanks for understanding! W33dscoper (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- OK thank you love for sharing all this with me, so interesting to know more about you :) I will copy/paste your answer in Current status of talk page editors then you can erase this present section if/whenever you feel like it :) Btw as you know I agree with you biological maleness should be listed as a fatal condition of course, it is obvious to me (as of May 2020 and way way before actually) 86.129.117.3 (talk) 18:04, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- My reasoning is that maleness kills the victim indirectly like HIV/AIDS, and since HIV/AIDS is listed on that page with a CFR, I decided to put biological maleness there too. After reading the discussion on that page, however, I think that it might be better to leave biological maleness off the list for now until 1) Biological maleness becomes officially classified as a disease (as per WP:OR), 2) A proper CFR gets evaluated for biological maleness (also as per WP:OR), and 3) Consensus is reached that the page should include non-infectious diseases (since you can't catch biological maleness by being near someone who is biologically male). Hope this helps! W33dscoper (talk) 06:41, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yes indeed it helps very much you revealing your line of thought on this, very interesting indeed thank you love :) Tbh personally I would tend not to consider biological maleness as a "disease" but rather as a "condition". 86.129.117.3 (talk) 09:39, 3 June 2020 (UTC)