Vuj.Ivan
- Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or sock puppetry.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Arheoloski park Vizula, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.istriago.com/attraction.php?title_eng=arheoloski-park-vizula.
It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Arheoloski park Vizula
edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Arheoloski park Vizula requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.istriago.com/attraction.php?title_eng=arheoloski-park-vizula. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Qpalzmmzlapq | talk | contribs 13:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
April 2017
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Vuj.Ivan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Sirs, I would like to take this opportunity and point out you the following. First, I'm not advertising anything or anybody. Second, all uploaded photos are my copy-wright. Third, text is written by my own words. I find it very inappropriate to block me because nothing is made for promotion. I have uploaded photos under the name istriago, because I did not notice and I forget to change the name of photos. I apologies for it. Please unblock me, asap. Vuj.Ivan (talk) 06:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Virtually every edit you have made on Wikipedia has been intended to drive traffic to your website. That is completely unacceptable. Unless you undertake to avoid adding any further links to your site, you will not be permitted to edit here. Yunshui 雲水 08:45, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vuj.Ivan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I just put link as source, as it was already done by other web-pages. Istriago.net is not tourist agency, or profit organization, or my web site or...It is a on-line book, for locals from Istria to post their stories, photos, of Istria, free of charge. I think it is misunderstanding between your point of view on Istriago.net. Anyway, I would like to take this opportunity and inform you that I will avoid adding links, but can I use it as external link? Vuj.Ivan (talk) 12:27, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No. Since your only interest seems to be promoting your site, I don't see that unblocking you would be helpful. Kuru (talk) 14:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vuj.Ivan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Sirs, Please notice this is not my web site. There is a big misunderstanding due to different point of view on Istriago.net. As already mention to you this is not my web-site, agency or any other private - business things. Istriago.net is on-line book made by locals from Istria. Everyone ( Local) can be part of it and make a post, same as you are doing on Wikipedia. My question still remain open, can I use it as external link? I don't understand why you block me.Please unblock me, because I did not promote nothing, I wrote facts, upload photos taken by myself. Only think I did I use Istriago.net as external reference so that you can see it is written by real local person from Istria.
Decline reason:
Istriago.net is not a reliable source. See WP:RS. Note that Wikipedia is also not a reliable source; this isn't a criticism of Istriago.net, it's just that you can't use it here to cite information. Yamla (talk) 10:32, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vuj.Ivan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
But this is not a reason to block me. It seems that you are blocking me due to Istriago.net. I'm not Istriago. Istriago is made by local people from Istria, and it is a book base on photos, things exist and it is real. For example you delete my post about art murals in Vodnjan. This is real and it exist....
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 23:08, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Because of WP:IDHT, I have revoked talk page access for the duration of the block. Another admin will be along shortly to review this final unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 13:10, 25 April 2017 (UTC)