Welcome! edit

Hello, Vu-0001, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as New Haven I-5 class, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! MereTechnicality (talk) 23:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of New Haven I-5 class edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on New Haven I-5 class requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://steamlocomotive.com/hudson/?page=nynhh. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MereTechnicality (talk) 23:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of New Haven I-5 class edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on New Haven I-5 class requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.steamlocomotive.com/hudson/?page=nynhh. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. MereTechnicality (talk) 23:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm DAJF. I noticed that you made a change to an article, JNR Class C55, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 01:24, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of New Haven I-5 class edit

Hello Vu-0001,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged New Haven I-5 class for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Triptothecottage (talk) 01:54, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply


 

Regarding Speedy Deletion
Hello, Vu-0001. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion.
Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into things to avoid or what Wikipedia is not.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject.
Sometimes articles are deleted because they contain content copyrighted elsewhere. Such content can be used as a source of information, but the content here must be completely rewritten from scratch.
Some articles contain material written in a promotional tone. These must often be written from scratch. They are vigorously deleted.
Any content that is negative in tone and unsourced or which is disparaging will also be vigorously deleted.
Any deficiencies with notability, sourcing, or things to avoid should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.
For test edits, click Vu-0001/sandbox
If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.
You may find this tool useful: Google custom search
If you reply to me on your talk page, please place {{replyto|dlohcierekim}} at the beginning of your reply.


If you have verifiable information from reliable sources that show subject does meet notability requirements Let me know.
CONTENT IN ARTICLES NEEDS TO BE RELIABLY SOURCED.

Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:05, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Just so you know JNR Class 8620 does not contain any references and has been moved edit

Hi there Vu-0001! I just wanted to let you know that I have moved JNR Class 8620 to Draft:JNR Class 8620 as it does not contain any references at this time. This allows you (and other editors should they choose) more time to work with improving the article as it could have been tagged for deletion without references. Thank you for the work you have done so far & please feel free to submit to AfC or move it back to the article namespace once reliable and independent references have been added and other improvements made. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:13, 9 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of CNW Class D edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CNW Class D requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.thevintagenews.com/2016/06/14/the-beautiful-elegant-charismatic-e-2-locomotives-none-survive-all-were-scrapped/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DAJF (talk) 13:13, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of New Haven I-5 Class edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on New Haven I-5 Class requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.catskillarchive.com/rrextra/nynh1400.Html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DAJF (talk) 13:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Persisting in posting copyright infringing articles is not acceptable, nor is posting incoherent text not written in proper English. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

May 2017 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at JNR Class C55 ‎, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 01:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copying licensed material requires proper attribution edit

Hi. I see in a recent addition to New Haven Class I-5 you included material from a webpage that is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this legal requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:38, 12 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (SEK class Κγ) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating SEK class Κγ, Vu-0001!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Sourcing is a little unclear here, one inline, one not (best if both are WP:INLINECITED).

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:30, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (SEK Class Δγ) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating SEK Class Δγ, Vu-0001!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This also has the same issue with sourcing.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:31, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve SPAP class Δ (Vulcan) edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Vu-0001, thanks for creating SPAP class Δ (Vulcan)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please make your sources clear.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve JGR Class 7010 edit

Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. Vu-0001, thanks for creating JGR Class 7010!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. poorly translated

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

InsertCleverPhraseHere (or here) 10:34, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your contributed article, JGR Class 160 edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, JGR Class 160. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – JGR Class 150. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at JGR Class 150. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. — InsertCleverPhraseHere (or here) 10:36, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve JNR Class C63 edit

Hi, I'm Insertcleverphrasehere. Vu-0001, thanks for creating JNR Class C63!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. poorly translated without references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

InsertCleverPhraseHere (or here) 10:38, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

JGR Class 160 and JGR Class 150 edit

I noticed that JGR Class 160 was an exact copy of JGR Class 150. Due to the content and claims made in the articles, they both can't be correct. I have redirected JGR Class 160 to JGR Class 150 for now, but perhaps you could sort out this issue and get back to me on my talk page? — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 00:38, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017 edit

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to JGR Class 7010, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 05:03, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of JGR Class 7010 edit

 

The article JGR Class 7010 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is further beyond credible fixing than a blank page would be. (Part of a large cleanup)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:39, 26 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017 edit

  Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to JGR Class 7010, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. DAJF (talk) 05:57, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of JGR Class 1800 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as JGR Class 1800, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of JGR Class 1070 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as JGR Class 1070, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of JGR Class 230 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as JGR Class 230, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:51, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Continued creation of unacceptable articles. edit

You've just created another three articles:

All of which are near-identical, near-identical to the equally incorrect JGR Class 150 / JGR Class 160 that you created a few days ago. All claimed the same "first locomotive built in Japan" claim, which was no more correct now than it was then.

Creating fake article like this is not acceptable. Please explain - despite frequent warnings, we're still without any discussion or explanation from you. Please stop doing it, or else I will seek to have you blocked. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:56, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

September 2017 edit

  Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to JGR Class 7010, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:07, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve JGR Class 8900 edit

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Vu-0001, thanks for creating JGR Class 8900!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating this. Could you please add your source?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 07:37, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Notice of noticeboard discussion edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:21, 28 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (JGR Class 160) has been reviewed! edit

Thanks for creating JGR Class 160, Vu-0001!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for 1 issue.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 19:29, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Pennsylvania Railroad class K3s edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Pennsylvania Railroad class K3s, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of New Haven I-5 Class edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on New Haven I-5 Class requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.catskillarchive.com/rrextra/nynh1400.Html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nightfury 12:12, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:JNR Class C63 edit

 

Hello, Vu-0001. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "JNR Class C63".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 06:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Pennsylvania Railroad 3768 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Pennsylvania Railroad 3768, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 18:04, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pennsylvania Railroad 3768 edit

 

The article Pennsylvania Railroad 3768 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cites no sources, no indication of importance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. bop34talkcontribs 15:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of New Haven class I-5 edit

 

The article New Haven class I-5 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, likely non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of PRR 2445 edit

 

The article PRR 2445 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, likely non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pennsylvania Railroad class K3s edit

 

The article Pennsylvania Railroad class K3s has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, likely non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not publish articles without citing a single source. Sources aren't optional. They are needed to verify the contents, and to establish notability of the subject. I have just PRODded three unsourced stubs, and I can see that there are more of your creation that are also unsourced. Please ensure that your articles are supported by sufficient reliable sources before publishing, otherwise incubate in your draft space until ready. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:37, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lehigh Valley K-5. Laplorfill (talk) 03:40, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Victorian Railways X class (1886) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Victorian Railways X class (1886) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:08, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Victorian Railways X class (1889) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Victorian Railways X class (1889) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:09, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Victorian Railways 'New A' class edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Victorian Railways 'New A' class requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:21, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pennsylvania Railroad 3768 edit

 

The article Pennsylvania Railroad 3768 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, no signs of importance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:14, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Pennsylvania Railroad class K3s for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pennsylvania Railroad class K3s is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pennsylvania Railroad class K3s until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 20:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Highland Railway Castle Class edit

 

The article Highland Railway Castle Class has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced one-line article with no assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laplorfill (talk) 01:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Victorian Railways X class (1886) edit

 

The article Victorian Railways X class (1886) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced one-line article with no assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laplorfill (talk) 01:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Victorian Railways X class (1889) edit

 

The article Victorian Railways X class (1889) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced one-line article with no assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laplorfill (talk) 01:24, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Victorian Railways 'New A' class edit

 

The article Victorian Railways 'New A' class has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced one-line article with no assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laplorfill (talk) 01:25, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Victorian Railways Old A class edit

 

The article Victorian Railways Old A class has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced one-line article with no assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laplorfill (talk) 01:31, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Victorian Railways New A class edit

 

The article Victorian Railways New A class has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced one-line article with no assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Laplorfill (talk) 01:31, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Administrator discussion edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Laplorfill (talk) 01:45, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please note... edit

...that Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and because of that WP:Communication is required. You have 48 warnings or notices on this talk page dating back to February 2017, and you have not responded to a single one of them. That is not appropriate. I suggest that you go here and explain your editing behavior. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chicago and North Western class E edit

 

The article Chicago and North Western class E has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced one-line article with no assertion of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – robertsky (talk) 06:59, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

- creation of many one-line stubs is disruptive. You are also required to communicate with other editors when issues are raised. You have chosen to ignore them. Having checked your contributions, it is apparent that you are capable of creating quality articles, so why all the stubs? Mjroots (talk) 08:05, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Re the block, "indefinite" does not mean "forever". I'm willing to unblock if you will commit to not creating stubs in the future and communicating with other editors when issues are raised. You've done good work in the past, which is to be encouraged. Mjroots (talk) 08:37, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Lehigh Valley K-5 edit

  Hello, Vu-0001. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lehigh Valley K-5, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Lehigh Valley K-5 edit

 

Hello, Vu-0001. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lehigh Valley K-5".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply