Hi there. I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Foreign ops administration, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Foreign ops administration. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.--Fuhghettaboutit 16:58, 15 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

More than fair. I'm new to actively adding and/or modifying articles. I found something that wasn't in wikipedia, so I added it.


Beer Pong, etc.

edit

Hello. I see what you're trying to do with all of the swapping pages around, but you can't just go around moving pages without some discussion first. Changes in nomenclature should reflect an unbiased perspective, and should never be done hastily or without giving others a chance to weigh in. Your edits might give others the impression that you are more concerned with representing your own point of view than with improving Wikipedia as a source of unbiased information. Furthermore, you've made a bit of a mess, using redirects to link pages to the corresponding talk pages. Please consult WP:Move before moving pages again.

Feeeshboy (talk) 20:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)Reply


Hey, don't worry about it. Certainly there is a need for some cleanup of those pages, and as much as I wish that everyone out there knew what REAL pong is, the pages are labeled as they are because that's the terminology that is in common use. I don't know the exact protocols for major changes like page moving and merging offhand, but anything like that has a discussion process that gives other editors a chance to weigh in. It's possible that those moves were for the best, but it's important to give those who would oppose them the chance to speak. Cheers. Feeeshboy (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2007 (UTC)Reply