Vonhempton

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Landlord Links.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cerebellum (talk) 00:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Landlord Links concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Landlord Links, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:11, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Landlord Links

Hello Vonhempton. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Landlord Links.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Landlord Links}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:01, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Vonhempton (talk) 12:48, 3 December 2013 (UTC)Thank you. I will try to fix within next few days. VonHempton Vonhempton (talk) 12:48, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David padilla

The article David padilla has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jinkinson talk to me 15:48, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

VonHempton December 4, 2013 5:22pm

for page / vandalism / need full page protection asap / thank you David Padilla (Disc Jockey (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs | views)[edit] Full-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Vonhempton (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC) Any information on the page is taken directly from MIAMI NEW TIMES. Please read source material. Thank you. Vonhempton (talk) 22:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)VonHempton

There is no IP vandalism to that page. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 22:25, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Writ_Keeper, there are people who are known enemies of David Padilla (Disc Jockey) and have removed most of the article including photos I have taken myself and that belong to me. PLEASE HELP ME and protect this page. I am a writer, a journalist and the aunt of David Padilla who suffered a stroke and is paralyzed. I sourced the article properly. I need help with one or two of your contributors. Thank you.

Hey, Vonhempton, I don't have time right now, but I'll take a closer look at this in a few hours to see if I can help. Briefly, though, I'd say that I don't think the people who are editing the page are enemies of David or even know him personally; I think they're just trying to bring the article up to meet the normal expectations of a Wikipedia article. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 22:58, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David padilla may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• systems in some of the most well known clubs such as [[The Mix]] and others such as [[Cameo]] (which he co-designed and built with [[Louis Puig]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David padilla may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• In March, [[Kirby Sommers]], his aunt, along with some of his DJ friends (such as [[John Benitez|John "Jellybean" Benitez]], [[Edgar V]], [[Joey Madonia]], and over 100

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:57, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Padilla (disc jockey) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Dee-vine and was the first place [[Elaine Lancaster]] performed upon her arrival in South Beach (after showing up at Gianni Versace's house where she was to begin working and finding out he had
• Versace's house where she was to begin working and finding out he had been viciously murdered]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Padilla (disc jockey) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• which transformed itself into what would go down in history as simply [["Warsaw"|Warsaw Ballroom]]). The crowd was more mixed and more glamorous than any of the other clubs anywhere. [[Warsaw

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to David Padilla (disc jockey) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Padilla (disc jockey), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Madonna, Cameo and The Mix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Warsaw Ballroom

Hello, Vonhempton, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, Warsaw Ballroom, is copied from another Wikipedia page, Warsaw ballroom. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:

1. a link to the article you copied from
2. the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 11:51, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Suggestions

Hi Vonhempton, I think the guidelines at WP:NPOV, WP:PEACOCK and WP:RELIABLE will be helpful. A lot of what you've added reads as blatantly promotional in tone, and won't stick in its present form. Thank you, JNW (talk) 21:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

The images are the least concern here. I think it's likely that WP:COI is an issue, too. I've cut a lot of unsourced and melodramatic text, much of which had little to do with Mr. Padilla, but was essentially a hyperbolic remembrance of the club and its nightlife. Likewise, unsourced details about his personal life and medical condition, and copious namedropping don't belong in an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines I've suggested above. Thank you, JNW (talk) 01:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Please do not continue to restore inadequately sourced content, or link to unacceptable sources--see WP:RELIABLE, as suggested above. Thank you, JNW (talk) 16:36, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi JNW, how do I insert information on the CDs which are of value in his musical history? I posted 2 sources for each of the cds. How is this not enough or not adequate? Please explain. Thank you. -VonHempton

Again, please read WP:RELIABLE for sources and in this case WP:MUSIC and WP:NALBUMS as to the notability of the CDs. JNW (talk) 17:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

I figured we were headed here since yesterday: to be clear, the next time you add promotional tone to an article or add inappropriate templates--the implication being that you own an article and that other editors are vandalizing it by attempting to bring it to encyclopedic standards--I will request either you be blocked or the page be protected from your editing, or both. Thank you, JNW (talk) 21:50, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

David Padilla (Disc Jockey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Vonhempton (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Any information on the page is taken directly from MIAMI NEW TIMES. Please read source material. Thank you. VonHempton

There is no IP vandalism to that page; protection is not warranted. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 22:25, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

• What Writ Keeper said. I think you should listen to what JNW has to say: if you continue calling good-faith edits "vandalism", and if you continue to insert material that is not neutral, improperly sourced etc, you may well find yourself blocked, since this back and forthing in the article is getting to be a waste of time. Drmies (talk) 00:33, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Katrina Home Drive for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katrina Home Drive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katrina Home Drive until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 00:47, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, Vonhempton. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JNW (talk) 02:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

• With this in mind, I've reverted your most recent edits, especially while the main article about the relief organization with which you appear to be affiliated is the subject of an AfD discussion. Thank you, JNW (talk) 02:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
• It's time to stop this kind of editing: if it persists, I will block you for having a promotion-only account. Drmies (talk) 03:19, 9 December 2013 (UTC)