Your submission at Articles for creation: Luíza Fazio (September 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Vmbr903! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luíza Fazio (April 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Majash2020 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Majash2020 (talk) 04:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Luíza Fazio (July 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
S0091 (talk) 21:25, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello, @S0091 -- First of all, thank you for the speedy evaluation of the draft! In hopes to improve my contributions in the future, I'd like to better understand your reasoning behind the rejection -- I understand it was deemed "not sufficiently notable", but if you could give any further information about this verdict, it would be very helpful.
Secondly, I'd like to understand if it would still be possible to send a new version, with improved writing and sources, of this draft for evaluation in the future.
I am a recent editor and all clarifications are much appreciated -- thanks in advance! Vmbr903 (talk) 02:17, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Luíza Fazio edit

  Hello, Vmbr903. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luíza Fazio, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 29 December 2023 (UTC)Reply