User talk:Vizcarra/August 2005

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Joaquin Ma. Gutierrez

Hi Vizcarra. Would you mind taking a look at the deletion discussion and the related article for Joaquin Ma. Gutierrez? Understandably, Google isn't always the best tool for determining one's notability, but there doesn't appear to be much information online regarding this individual. This is a Filipino musician, supposedly, but most of what little that turns up is in Spanish and may or may not be related. My suspicion is that this is a vanity article but I wanted to run it by you before casting my vote. Hall Monitor 23:43, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

You have violated the Wikipedia:Three revert rule

You have violated the Wikipedia:Three revert rule. I strongly recommend that you revert yourself before you are blocked for this. Jayjg ^(talk) 19:49, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

The information there has been well sourced from multiple locations, both in the article itself, and on the Talk: page. You seem unwilling to accept that the sources say what they do. In any event, it's much easier to work this out on the Talk: page rather than reverting what you don't like; by my count you've reverted the contentious sentence at least 7 times in the past 24 hours. Jayjg ^(talk) 20:20, 10 August 2005 (UTC)

3RR

Hi Vizcarra, you've been reported for 3RR at Anti-Semitism. If you continue to revert there, or if you violate 3RR again anywhere else, you may be blocked from editing for up to 24 hours. Please try to reach a compromise on the talk page. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 19:50, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

Hi again, Jay and I had an edit conflict; you were actually reported on WP:AN/3RR some time before Jay's post. I think you can still revert yourself, and it would probably be a good idea to do that. As for the content, 3RR applies regardless of content, and it applies to partial, as well as to whole, reverts, so it's best to look for a compromise on the talk pages and wait for that to emerge, rather than reverting back and forth. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:03, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

It's okay. I saw you had rephrased rather than reverting, so you may have misunderstood what I meant. I've reverted for you. Be careful not to keep rephrasing because you may violate 3RR again, and if you do, you're likely to be blocked. As I said, the nature of the content (unless it's vandalism) is irrelevant to the revert rule. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:11, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

You did another partial revert, so you've been temporarily blocked from editing. If you feel this is unfair, you're welcome to e-mail me using the link on my user page, and I'll get straight back to you. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 20:23, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

List of Mexicans

Hola Amigo, The List of Mexicans has been nominated for deletion, I believe that you might be interested in expressing your opinion. You can do so here: ((VfD)). Take care, your friend Tony the Marine 20:29, August 10, 2005 (UTC)

Change of heart

Hi Vizcarra. While I respect your opinion of me and value the contributions you've made here, I hope you can have a change of heart regarding the past. No matter what the outcome may be, I will continue to strive to do my best here and wish you the best as well. Regards, Hall Monitor 19:11, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

In that case you have my support. Good luck! --Vizcarra 19:22, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Block

David, you've been temporarily blocked for disruption because of your recreation of a personal attack page that was deleted. I'm very willing to discuss lifting the block if you want to e-mail me. Cheers, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 21:37, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

No personal attack was proven, in fact I was protecting a user page from being attacked. I already e-mailed you and haven't received a response. --Vizcarra 21:40, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Still waiting. --Vizcarra 21:59, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

I've just replied. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 22:03, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

User page in LDS category

Hi, I notice your user page is in Category:Latter Day Saints; I assume this in error, as that's an 'article space' category. Can I suggest you might wish to place yourself in Category:Christian Wikipedians (or in a not-yet-existant Category:Latter Day Saint Wikipedians), which is in the 'wikipedians' category subtree? Thanks. Alai 00:58, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Congratulations

Due to your award. I believe in yor talent.

Agguizar 02:36, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

Julio Linares

Would you mind commenting on a recent discussion over at Wikipedia:Pages for deletion/Julio Linares? This was initially tagged for deletion due to being a non-English article, and has since been replaced with copyvio content, apparently. Your input regarding this article would be appreciated. Hall Monitor 22:51, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

Anahí

Dear Vizcarra, I'm happy to see that you created a page for Anahí (actress), since the last one about her was a flagrant copvio by some other user. However, you used the disambiguation page to locate it, something that is not the proper way to do it. The name Anahí has other uses, and it would suit better to actually locate it at a distinctive and unique page, namely, the one I quoted above. Otherwise, it could easily lead to confusion. Imagine someone trying to look for the South American myth (an article that I'm currently working on, and about to upload), and falling directly into the actress' page, with no indication at all on where to find the proper information.

I repeat that I'm glad that you made that page, but please, leave it at its proper location. It is what it is usually done in such cases. Hugs! Shauri 20:27, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

I understand your point, but I believe you're mistaking for a couple of reasons. Don't compare the fame of Mexico (country) against other places with the same name with the fame of the actress. In several countries of South America, the actress is almost unknown, whereas the myth is vastly popular. And yes, as of now it has no article, and no connections, but I'm working on it. It's the legend of the origin of the ceibo, the national flower of Argentina, so several pages will be linking to it soon. I encourage you to keep a clear page to difference each one; it's the most fair thing to do in cases like this. Shauri 20:43, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Well, I still believe you're mistaking. The test you've conducted is misguided IMHO; i. e., I'm sure a Google search on Troy - Brad Pitt or Troy - Movie will get many more hits than Troy - Mythology or Troy - Homer. Yet, no one will dare to put one use above the other.

Still, I won't make a fuss out of this. So let's have things your way - at least for now. Thank you for your good wishes and your endorsement to my upcoming contributions - I really apreciatte them. Shauri 21:18, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Response

Hi Vizcarra,

Thanks for your kind words. They are always appreciated.

Node 01:25, 31 August 2005 (UTC)